Household wealth and the measurement of economic well-being in the United States

By E. Wolff, Ajit Zacharias. 2009

138 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Accounting, Finance, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/159289a011bdc2ab96c4b1d6768638698c42875e

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Accounting

1. Michael Hübler
2. Stephen P. Jenkins
3. Thomas Piketty
4. Emmanuel Saez
5. G. Zucman
6. Bertrand Garbinti
7. Jonathan Goupille-Lebret
8. Stefanie Stantcheva

In Finance

1. Michael Hübler
2. Stephen P. Jenkins
3. Thomas Piketty
4. S. Marginson
5. Terry Hyland

In Sociology and Political Science

1. Shuaizhang Feng
2. Richard V. Burkhauser
3. Jeff Larrimore
4. Stephen P. Jenkins
5. Michael Hübler
6. Thomas Piketty
7. Sean F. Reardon
8. Emmanuel Saez

Citations in the corpus

• The Return of "Patrimonial Capitalism" : A Review of Thomas Piketty's Capital in the Twenty-First Century (2014, unknown): “…“classical” of the Belle Époque with very high correlation between ownership of capital and high incomes; the “convergence capitalism,” where that correlation was weaker because of physical destruction of capital, low rates of return, 15 This point was originally made by Wolff and Zacharias (2009).”
• On the Long-Run Evolution of Inheritance: France 1820–2050 (2011, background): “9 Wolff and Zacharias (2009) attempt to combine income and wealth data from the SCF in order to obtain more comprehensive measures of top capital income flows in the US during the 1980s-1990s.”
• The inequality-emissions nexus in the context of trade and development: A quantile regression approach (2017, background): “Wealth inequality is likely higher and not necessarily correlated with income (cf. Wolff and Zacharias, 2009, for the United States).”
• Recent Trends in Top Income Shares in the USA: Reconciling Estimates from March CPS and IRS Tax Return Data (2009, result): “Wolff and Zacharias (2009) compare SCF estimates of top income shares to those of Piketty and Saez and find similar levels for the top 1 percent‟s share in recent years – although they observe more of the rise coming prior to 1994 than Piketty and Saez do.”
• WEALTH INEQUALITY: A SURVEY (2015, unknown): “7Appropriately accounting for wealth in this way substantially changes the structure of the distribution of economic well-being (Wolff and Zacharias 2009).”