A pseudo-waveform technique to assess forest structure using discrete lidar data

By Jordan D. Muss, David J. Mladenoff, Philip A. Townsend. 2011

73 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Environmental Engineering, Insect Science, Nature and Landscape Conservation

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/158415b8ec89862bf0ffe68a51b92a2e77580816

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Environmental Engineering

1. Shelley A. Hinsley
2. Ross A. Hill
3. M. Sumnall

In Insect Science

1. Shelley A. Hinsley
2. Ross A. Hill
3. M. Sumnall

In Nature and Landscape Conservation

1. Shelley A. Hinsley
2. Ross A. Hill
3. M. Sumnall

Citations in the corpus

• Comparison of small-footprint discrete return and full waveform airborne lidar data for estimating multiple forest variables (2016, background): “…other published studies; e.g. number of tree stems 472 (Lee & Lucas, 2007; Næsset, 2002), mean height to the living crown (Andersen et al., 2005; 473 Muss et al., 2011), DBH and basal area (Næsset, 2002; 2004), and downed deadwood volume 474 (Mücke et al., 2013), the prediction accuracy in the…”