For-Profit Welfare: Contracts, Conflicts, and the Performance Paradox

By J. Dias, Steven Maynard-Moody. 2006

173 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Gender Studies, Public Administration, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/157b750929e53a448eed64d7decd147f3087bb89

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Gender Studies

1. Carolyn J. Heinrich
2. Anna Amirkhanyan

In Public Administration

1. G. Marschke
2. Carolyn J. Heinrich
3. Anna Amirkhanyan
4. M. Fares Hout
5. Stuart W. Elliott

In Sociology and Political Science

1. G. Marschke
2. Carolyn J. Heinrich
3. Anna Amirkhanyan

Citations in the corpus

• Collaborative Performance Measurement: Examining and Explaining the Prevalence of Collaboration in State and Local Government Contracts (2009, background): “In contrast, many point to the clash of public and for-profit service-delivery philosophies: one focuses on individual outcomes and the other on the financial bottom line (Dias and Maynard-Moody 2006).”
• Coping During Public Service Delivery: A Conceptualization and Systematic Review of the Literature (2015, unknown): “As noted, this corresponds with work about frontline workers (Dias and Maynard-Moody, 2007; Maynard-Moody & Musheno, 2003).”
• Incentives and their dynamics in public sector performance management systems (2010, background): “In the undesirable case in which both principal and agent motivations and the effects of agent actions on performance and value do not align, the consequences for government performance can be disastrous, as Dias and Maynard-Moody (2007) showed.”