Evaluation in Text: Authorial Stance and the Construction of Discourse

By S. Hunston, G. Thompson. 2001

817 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/1567536845db553f2c3dbdf4e994274966d480d6

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

1. Claire Cardie
2. Theresa Wilson
3. Janyce Wiebe
4. Saif M. Mohammad
5. Bing Liu
6. Yejin Choi
7. Rada Mihalcea
8. B. Liu

Citations in the corpus

• Genre-Based Pedagogies: A Social Response to Process. (2003, background): “Another research direction has looked at language variation across genres and the resources available for creating meanings in a culture (Hunston & Thompson, 2001).”
• Annotating Expressions of Opinions and Emotions in Language (2005, methodology): “The work most similar to ours is the framework proposed by Appraisal Theory (Martin, 2000; White, 2002) for analyzing evaluation and stance in discourse.”
• Stance in spoken and written university registers (2006, unknown): “Such investigations have been carried out under several different labels, including ‘evaluation’ (Hunston, 1994; Hunston & Thompson, 2000), ‘intensity’ (Labov, 1984), ‘affect’ (Ochs, 1989), ‘evidentiality’ (Chafe, 1986; Chafe & Nichols, 1986), ’hedging’ (Holmes, 1988; Hyland, 1996a,b), and ‘stance’…”