The biology and epidemiology of the mountain pine beetle in lodgepole pine forests.

By L. Safranyik, A. Carroll, B. Wilson. 2006

463 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/15436b1b4e287c608dd5f3759a6d4e8f5767e89a

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

1. Michael J. Wingfield
2. B. Slippers
3. J. Garnas
4. J. Roux
5. A. Carroll
6. B. Hurley
7. Joanne C. White
8. R. Hall

Citations in the corpus

• Pine monoterpenes and pine bark beetles: a marriage of convenience for defense and chemical communication (2006, background): “A small percentage of the population may disperse above the forest canopy (Furniss and Furniss 1972; Safranyik et al. 1992; Safranyik and Carroll 2006).”
• Climate change could alter the distribution of mountain pine beetle outbreaks in western Canada (2012, background): “Th e biology, phenology, and behavioral ecology of the mountain pine beetle have been well-studied and extensively reviewed (see Safranyik and Carroll 2006 and references therein).”
• The role of forest genetic resources in responding to biotic and abiotic factors in the context of anthropogenic climate change (2014, background): “It is well known, for example, that drought stress reduces the ability of conifers to defend against bark beetles due to changes in plant defences (Ayres and Lombardero, 2000; Safranyik and Carroll, 2006).”
• Which trees die during drought? The key role of insect host‐tree selection (2019, background): “…and D. brevicomis ) expand their successful attacks from smaller or less vigorous trees to additionally include larger, vigor - ous trees (e.g. Bleiker, O'Brien, Smith, & Carroll, 2014; Boone et al., 2011; Miller & Keen, 1960; Negrón, Allen, Cook, & Withrow, 2008; Safranyik & Carroll, 2006).”
• Potential for Range Expansion of Mountain Pine Beetle into the Boreal Forest of North America (2010, methodology): “They may cause very high localized mortality in beetle populations (Otvos 1965; Amman and Cole 1983; Safranyik and Carroll 2006), but territoriality limits their numerical response to increases in mountain pine beetle populations (Berryman 1973; Korol 1985).”
• Spatial–temporal analysis of species range expansion: the case of the mountain pine beetle, Dendroctonus ponderosae (2009, background): “In order to overcome the defences of its hosts, the mountain pine beetle has evolved synchronous, pheromone-mediated mass-attacks, with symbiotic relationships with several species of fungi (Ophiostomatales: Ophiostomataceae, Ophiostoma) (Safranyik & Carroll, 2006).”
• Remote sensing of forest pest damage: a review and lessons learned from a Canadian perspective* (2016, background): “these attack stages is highly variable and depends upon a number of factors, including attack density and timing, tree moisture and condition, tree species, as well as site-specific factors (Safranyik and Carroll 2006).”
• Established and new technologies reduce increasing pest and pathogen threats to Eucalypt plantations (2013, background): “Thus, the insect was shown to have invaded South America and South Africa separately (Nadel et al., 2010).”
• Autologistic regression analysis of spatial-temporal binary data via Monte Carlo maximum likelihood (2008, background): “A plausible explanation for the strong spatial and temporal dependence is dispersal of the MPB populations across space and over time, as during MPB outbreaks, beetle populations are capable of dispersal at the scale of hundreds of kilometers (Safranyik and Carroll 2006).”