Simple yet Effective Bridge Reasoning for Open-Domain Multi-Hop Question Answering

By Wenhan Xiong, Mo Yu, Xiaoxiao Guo, Hong Wang, Shiyu Chang, Murray Campbell, William Yang Wang. 2019

11 citations recorded by the source corpus.

A key challenge of multi-hop question answering (QA) in the open-domain setting is to accurately retrieve the supporting passages from a large corpus. Existing work on open-domain QA typically relies on off-the-shelf information retrieval (IR) techniques to retrieve answer passages, i.e., the passages containing the groundtruth answers. However, IR-based approaches are insufficient for multi-hop questions, as the topic of the second or further hops is not explicitly covered by the question. To resolve this issue, we introduce a new subproblem of open-domain multi-hop QA, which aims to recognize the bridge (i.e., the anchor that links to the answer passage) from the context of a set of start passages with a reading comprehension model. This model, the bridge reasoner, is trained with a weakly supervised signal and produces the candidate answer passages for the passage reader to extract the answer. On the full-wiki HotpotQA benchmark, we significantly improve the baseline method by 14 point F1. Without using any memory inefficient contextual embeddings, our result is also competitive with the state-of-the-art that applies BERT in multiple modules.

Subfields: Artificial Intelligence, Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Information Retrieval & Search, Natural Language Processing

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Artificial Intelligence

  1. Hannaneh Hajishirzi
  2. Luke S. Zettlemoyer
  3. Sebastian Riedel
  4. Mohit Bansal
  5. Jianfeng Gao
  6. Danqi Chen
  7. Yejin Choi
  8. Wen-tau Yih

In Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition

  1. Hannaneh Hajishirzi
  2. Sebastian Riedel
  3. Luke S. Zettlemoyer
  4. Zhe Gan
  5. Patrick Lewis
  6. Jingjing Liu
  7. Danqi Chen
  8. Fabio Petroni

In Information Retrieval & Search

  1. Sebastian Riedel
  2. Danqi Chen
  3. Hannaneh Hajishirzi
  4. Patrick Lewis
  5. Fabio Petroni
  6. Sewon Min
  7. Luke S. Zettlemoyer
  8. Wen-tau Yih

In Natural Language Processing

  1. Hannaneh Hajishirzi
  2. Sebastian Riedel
  3. Luke S. Zettlemoyer
  4. Mohit Bansal
  5. Danqi Chen
  6. Jianfeng Gao
  7. Wen-tau Yih
  8. Percy Liang

Citations in the corpus