On the fragmentation of a torus by random walk
By Augusto Teixeira, David Windisch. 2010
62 citations recorded by the source corpus.
We consider a simple random walk on a discrete torus \input amssym $({\Bbb Z}/N{\Bbb Z})^d$ with dimension d ≥ 3 and large side length N. For a fixed constant u ≥ 0, we study the percolative properties of the vacant set, consisting of the set of vertices not visited by the random walk in its first [uNd] steps. We prove the existence of two distinct phases of the vacant set in the following sense: If u > 0 is chosen large enough, all components of the vacant set contain no more than (log N)λ(u) vertices with high probability as N tends to infinity. On the other hand, for small u > 0, there exists a macroscopic component of the vacant set occupying a nondegenerate fraction of the total volume Nd. In dimensions d ≥ 5, we additionally prove that this macroscopic component is unique by showing that all other components have volumes of order at most (log N)λ(u). Our results thus solve open problems posed by Benjamini and Sznitman, who studied the small u regime in high dimension. The proofs are based on a coupling of the random walk with random interlacements on \input amssym ${\Bbb Z}^d$. Among other techniques, the construction of this coupling employs a refined use of discrete potential theory. By itself, this coupling strengthens a result by Windisch. © 2011 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
Subfields: Condensed Matter Physics, Mathematical Physics, Statistics and Probability
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/152b70a72d85d486f7e9d3247438830f68a1da02
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Condensed Matter Physics
In Mathematical Physics
In Statistics and Probability
Citations in the corpus
- Soft local times and decoupling of random interlacements (2012, methodology): “Since its introduction, the sprinkling technique has been useful for several problems on random interlacements [21], [26], [32].”
- Gumbel fluctuations for cover times in the discrete torus (2012, methodology): “9 from [25] with an application of Proposition 5.”