Recalculation of the Critical Values for Lawshe’s Content Validity Ratio

By Robert Wilson, Wei Pan, Donald A. Schumsky. 2012

711 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Education, Issues, ethics and legal aspects, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/152024bbeb3cddcd13d090ca9ca0f1d8c26b4fe7

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Education

1. Varaxy Yi
2. Natasha Saelua
3. Samuel D. Museus
4. C. Ayre
5. A. Scally
6. Julie J. Park

In Issues, ethics and legal aspects

1. Varaxy Yi
2. Samuel D. Museus
3. C. Ayre
4. A. Scally
5. Natasha Saelua

In Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health

1. Varaxy Yi
2. Samuel D. Museus
3. C. Ayre
4. A. Scally
5. Natasha Saelua

Citations in the corpus

• The Impact of Culturally Engaging Campus Environments on Sense of Belonging (2016, methodology): “Next, they used those ratings to compute content validity ratios (CVRs) to assess content validity (Lawshe, 1975; Wilson et al., 2012).”
• Critical Values for Lawshe’s Content Validity Ratio (2014, methodology): “In their article, Wilson et al. (2012) produced a new table of CVR critical values using the normal approximation to the binomial distribution.”