Options for differentiation of future commitments in climate policy: how to realise timely participation to meet stringent climate goals?

By M. Berk, Michel G.J. den Elzen. 2001

130 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, Environmental Engineering, Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/150b95e7f57af7f05d9ad0e5a4ac5863975781e6

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Economics and Econometrics

1. N. Höhne
2. Michel G. J. den Elzen
3. John C. V. Pezzey
4. F. Jotzo

In Environmental Engineering

1. N. Höhne
2. Michel G. J. den Elzen
3. F. Jotzo

In Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment

1. John C. V. Pezzey
2. N. Höhne
3. Michel G. J. den Elzen
4. F. Jotzo

Citations in the corpus

• Optimal intensity targets for greenhouse gas emissions trading under uncertainty (2007, background): “2 On proposals for intensity targets as a way to draw developing countries into a climate agreement, see Baumert et al. 1999, Frankel 1999, Lutter 2000, Philibert and Pershing 2001; on the Argentine target, see Bouille and Girardin 2002, Barros and Conte Grand 2002; on the Bush 'target', see for e”
• Reductions of greenhouse gas emissions in Annex I and non-Annex I countries for meeting concentration stabilisation targets (2008, background): “Emission Intensity EI Emission reductions related to improvements in the emission per unit GDP output ( Baumert et al.1999 ).”