GOODNESS-OF-FIT TESTS BASED ON A NEW CHARACTERIZATION OF THE EXPONENTIAL DISTRIBUTION

By Norbert Henze, Simos G. Meintanis. 2002

63 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Management Science and Operations Research, Statistics and Probability

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/150996f840180962a5ae3c983b87d28ef573a1f6

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Management Science and Operations Research

1. Jan W. H. Swanepoel
2. Simos G. Meintanis
3. Norbert Henze
4. H. Alizadeh Noughabi
5. Nasser Arghami

In Statistics and Probability

1. Nasser Arghami
2. Simos G. Meintanis
3. H. Alizadeh Noughabi
4. Norbert Henze
5. Jan W. H. Swanepoel
6. Ludwig Baringhaus
7. Bruno Ebner
8. H. Muhammed

Citations in the corpus

• Testing exponentiality based on characterizations of the exponential distribution (2011, background): “These alternatives were used by Henze and Meintanis [32] and Grane and Fortiana [40] in their study of power comparisons of several tests for exponentiality.”
• Bootstrap goodness-of-fit tests with estimated parameters based on empirical transforms (2007, methodology): “In particular, when testing for exponentiality, the straightforward approach of letting Dn(t) = Ln(t)−L(t) was taken up by Henze (1993), and Henze and Meintanis (2002a).”
• Recent and classical tests for exponentiality: a partial review with comparisons (2005, methodology): “We cross-reference simulation results from Henze and Meintanis (2002b), thereby including all three tests for exponentiality utilizing the empirical CF.”