A unified multiwavelength model of galaxy formation

By C. Lacey, C. Baugh, Carlos S. Frenk, A. Benson, Richard G. Bower, Shaun Cole, V. Gonzalez-Perez, John C. Helly, C. Lagos, P. D. M. Icc and 9 more. 2015

289 citations recorded by the source corpus.

We present a new version of the GALFORM semi-analytical model of galaxy formation. This brings together several previous developments of GALFORM into a single unified model, including a different initial mass function (IMF) in quiescent star formation and in starbursts, feedback from active galactic nuclei supressing gas cooling in massive halos, and a new empirical star formation law in galaxy disks based on their molecular gas content. In addition, we have updated the cosmology, introduced a more accurate treatment of dynamical friction acting on satellite galaxies, and updated the stellar population model. The new model is able to simultaneously explain both the observed evolution of the K-band luminosity function and stellar mass function, and the number counts and redshift distribution of sub-mm galaxies selected at 850μm. This was not previously achieved by a single physical model within the ΛCDM framework, but requires having an IMF in starbursts that is somewhat top-heavy. The new model is tested against a wide variety of observational data covering wavelengths from the far-UV to sub-mm, and redshifts from z = 0 to z = 6, and is found to be generally successful. These observations include the optical and near-IR luminosity functions, HI mass function, fraction of early type galaxies, Tully-Fisher, metallicity-luminosity and size-luminosity relations at z = 0, as well as far-IR number counts, and far-UV luminosity functions at z ∼ 3 − 6. Discrepancies are however found in galaxy sizes and metallicities at low luminosities, and in the abundance of low mass galaxies at high-z, suggesting the need for a more sophisticated model of supernova feedback.

Subfields: Astronomy and Astrophysics, Instrumentation

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/15067947e3213d5c04406b57bf5a97bf573ecdeb

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Astronomy and Astrophysics

  1. L. Hernquist
  2. Volker Springel
  3. P. Hopkins
  4. R. Dav'e
  5. M. Vogelsberger
  6. Shy Genel
  7. P. Torrey
  8. D. Nelson

In Instrumentation

  1. L. Hernquist
  2. Volker Springel
  3. P. Hopkins
  4. M. Vogelsberger
  5. R. Dav'e
  6. Shy Genel
  7. P. Torrey
  8. D. Nelson

Citations in the corpus