Non-uniform Deblurring for Shaken Images
By Oliver Whyte, Josef Sivic, Andrew Zisserman, Jean Ponce. 2010
785 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Media Technology
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition
- Ming-Hsuan Yang
- Luc Van Gool
- Dacheng Tao
- Chunhua Shen
- Xiaogang Wang
- Trevor Darrell
- Andrea Vedaldi
- Chen Change Loy
In Media Technology
- Ming-Hsuan Yang
- Jin-shan Pan
- Michael Hirsch
- Jiaya Jia
- Wangmeng Zuo
- Sunghyun Cho
- Radu Timofte
- Kyoung Mu Lee
Citations in the corpus
- Deblurring by Realistic Blurring (2020, background): “The blurring process can be mathematically formulated as [8, 38], where I B and I S are blurry and sharp images, respectively.”
- Unnatural L0 Sparse Representation for Natural Image Deblurring (2013, methodology): “[24] presented a non-uniform method using variational Bayesian.”
- Deep Image Deblurring: A Survey (2022, neutral): “Numerous approaches have been developed to address non-uniform blur by modeling the blur kernel from 3D camera motion (Hirsch et al. 2011; Whyte et al. 2012).”
- Blind deconvolution using a normalized sparsity measure (2011, methodology): “In this section, we present results of our algorithm and compare it to the algorithms of [4],[22] and [24].”
- Learning a convolutional neural network for non-uniform motion blur removal (2015, methodology): “Methods in [7, 8, 26, 31] work on non-uniform blur caused by camera rotations, in-plane translations or forward out-of-plane translations.”
- Blind deconvolution in scientific imaging & computational photography (2011, methodology): “7: The curve shows the relative error of a homographically transformed image (1600 × 1200 pixels) using the forward model of Whyte et al. (2010) and our fast forward model which approximates the homography by the camera motion constrained EFF framework.”
- Efficient marginal likelihood optimization in blind deconvolution (2011, methodology): “In general, despite the superior robustness of the MAPk estimation principle, only a few recent approaches to blind deconvolution have taken this direction [5, 22, 18], whereas many research attempts are devoted to the MAPx,k approach [20, 2, 4, 7, 6, 21, 3, 23].”
- DeblurGAN: Blind Motion Deblurring Using Conditional Adversarial Networks (2017, methodology): “[40] are non-CNN blind deblurring methods, whereas Sun et al.”
- Learning to Estimate and Remove Non-uniform Image Blur (2013, background): “We aim to overcome these limitations, and cast the estimation of the global (non-uniform) image blur as a multilabel energy minimization problem (Section 2).”
- Real-World Blur Dataset for Learning and Benchmarking Deblurring Algorithms (2020, background): “To deal with more realistic blur, several approaches with extended blur models have been proposed, but their performance is still limited due to the inherent ill-posedness of the inverse problem [18, 44, 8, 14, 17, 19].”
- DeblurGAN-v2: Deblurring (Orders-of-Magnitude) Faster and Better (2019, neutral): “[49], Xu et al .”
- A no-reference metric for evaluating the quality of motion deblurring (2013, background): “…et al. 2008; Cho and Lee 2009; Krishnan and Fergus 2009; ACM Transactions on Graphics, Vol. 32, No. 6, Article 175, Publication Date: November 2013 Whyte et al. 2010; Xu and Jia 2010; Cho et al. 2011; Levin et al. 2011; Zoran and Weiss 2011; Goldstein and Fattal 2012], but even state-of-the-art…”
- Segmentation-Free Dynamic Scene Deblurring (2014, methodology): “Our method does not require any complex model to handle specific types of motion blur [10, 23, 27] and does not depend on the accurate motion segmentation.”