Comparison of methane production between C3 and C4 grasses and legumes

By H. Archimède, M. Eugène, C. Magdeleine, M. Boval, Cécile Martin, D. Morgavi, P. Lecomte, M. Doreau. 2011

234 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Invited review: Enteric methane in dairy cattle production: quantifying the opportunities and impact of reducing emissions. (2014, methodology): “In essence, this has been done in the research to develop CH4 prediction equations (Moe and Tyrrell, 1979; Mills et al., 2003) and in the meta-analysis of Archimède et al. (2011), which accounted for intake and NDF digestibility (discussed in the previous section).”
Special topics--Mitigation of methane and nitrous oxide emissions from animal operations: I. A review of enteric methane mitigation options. (2013, unknown): “D ow nloaded from https://academ ic.oup.com /jas/article-abstract/91/11/5045/4731308 by guest on 15 M arch 2020 A meta-analysis by Archimède et al. (2011) investigated differences in CH4 production from animals fed C3 vs. C4 grasses and warm and cold climate legumes.”