When and how should biotic interactions be considered in models of species niches and distributions?

By R. P. Anderson. 2017

174 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Ecological Modeling, Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Nature and Landscape Conservation

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/14bbd53f7590fdbca9bb52e75e8fab0934b911d0

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Ecological Modeling

1. Maria João Santos
2. Adam B. Smith
3. B. Blonder
4. Pedro Cardoso
5. José Carlos Carvalho

In Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics

1. Maria João Santos
2. Adam B. Smith
3. B. Blonder
4. Pedro Cardoso
5. José Carlos Carvalho

In Nature and Landscape Conservation

1. Maria João Santos
2. Adam B. Smith
3. B. Blonder
4. Pedro Cardoso
5. José Carlos Carvalho

Citations in the corpus

• Testing the ability of species distribution models to infer variable importance (2019, background): “Environmental limits are mediated by biotic interactions (Stanton-Geddes et al. 2012; Anderson 2017; Godsoe et al. 2017), disturbance (Conlisk et al. 2013; Liang et al. 2018), and dispersal and population dynamics (Holt 2009; Pagel & Schurr 2012; Conlisk et al. 2013; Fordham et al. 2013).”
• Hypervolume concepts in niche‐ and trait‐based ecology (2018, background): “For example, the growing body of research on demographic models based on niches, traits, and species interactions (reviewed by Soberón 2010, Zurell et al. 2016, Anderson 2017) suggests that such extensions will be important.”