Measurement of strain and strain rate by echocardiography: ready for prime time?

By T. Marwick. Journal of the American College of Cardiology, 2006

635 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Biomedical Engineering, Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/14a834c7d778c6301cd0087156b6b6f6bade38c9

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Biomedical Engineering

1. Sherif F. Nagueh
2. C. Kuehl
3. A. Elhendy
4. Patricia A. Pellikka
5. S. Sawada

In Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine

1. Sherif F. Nagueh
2. Patricia A. Pellikka
3. C. Kuehl
4. A. Elhendy
5. S. Sawada
6. L. Badano
7. T. Marwick
8. Jose Luis Zamorano

In Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging

1. Sherif F. Nagueh
2. Patricia A. Pellikka
3. C. Kuehl
4. A. Elhendy
5. S. Sawada
6. T. Marwick

Citations in the corpus

• Current and evolving echocardiographic techniques for the quantitative evaluation of cardiac mechanics: ASE/EAE consensus statement on methodology and indications endorsed by the Japanese Society of Echocardiography. (2011, background): “with the possibility of measuring shear strain between myocardial layers.(52) Current and Evolving Echocardiographic Techniques for the Quantitative Evaluation of Cardiac Mechanics 189”
• American Society of Echocardiography recommendations for performance, interpretation, and application of stress echocardiography. (2007, methodology): “Recently introduced 2D echocardiographic methods for assessment of strain and strain rate eliminate the angle dependency of these Doppler-based techniques.(76) In the future, quantitative methods may serve as an adjunct to expert visual assessment of wall motion.”