Corporations and Human Rights: A Theory of Legal Responsibility

By Steven R. Ratner. 2001

383 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/149631d32ba207584cfe6031895d8ae2f71cc753

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management

1. Florian Wettstein
2. Prem Sikka
3. Margaret Mitchell
4. C. Macchi
5. E. Giuliani

Citations in the corpus

• Multinational corporations’ economic and human rights impacts on developing countries: a review and research agenda (2014, background): “Even worse, governments in some developing countries overlook human rights abuses perpetrated by foreign investors, provided the latter are satisfying certain economic targets (Herrmann, 1995; Apdodaca, 2001; Ratner, 2001).”
• Accounting for human rights: The challenge of globalization and foreign investment agreements (2011, background): “However, its recommendations are non-binding and considered to be “weak” (Ratner, 2001, p. p. 457). for human rights is not evident from annual financial reports or glossy CSR brochures.”
• CSR and the Debate on Business and Human Rights: Bridging the Great Divide (2012, background): “Most prevalently, they tend to rather narrowly emphasize and focus on what can (potentially) be enforced (see, e.g., Ratner 2001: 450, 530–40; ICHRP, 2002: 3, 77–120).4 As a result and according to John Ruggie’s (2007: 839) own assessment, the discussion on business and human rights has been…”
• Data Governance in the Age of Large-Scale Data-Driven Language Technology (2022, background): “the state [117], whereas the language data we propose to govern is”