Poverty and Deprivation in Europe
215 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Political Science and International Relations, Sociology and Political Science
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/149581453ea39ff0838a88cb46fde1feb7de3456
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Political Science and International Relations
In Sociology and Political Science
- C. Whelan
- B. Maître
- Anne-Catherine Guio
- Eric Marlier
- Sergio Tirado Herrero
- B. Nolan
- B. Perry
- Kenneth Nelson
Citations in the corpus
- Multidimensional poverty and inequality (2014, unknown): “Some examples of studies for rich countries are Mayer and Jencks (1989), Federman et al. (1996), Nolan and Whelan (1996a, 1996b, 2007, 2010, 2011), Whelan et al. (2001), Halleröd et al. (2006), Guio (2005), Cappellari and Jenkins (2007), Fusco and Dickes (2008), Fusco et al. (2010) and Figari…”
- A multidimensional index to measure energy poverty: the Polish case (2020, unknown): “By combining monetary and non-monetary indicators of energy poverty we follow Alkire et al. (2015) key argument (in line with Nolan and Whelan 2011) that multidimensional poverty measures which account for both monetary and non-monetary indicators are better than single monetary indicators.”
- Deep and persistent disadvantage in Australia (2013, unknown): “Nolan and Whelan (2011) found that:”
- Energy poverty indicators: A critical review of methods (2017, background): “).(45,48) Differences between both approaches have been often framed in terms of objective vs.”
- Improving the measurement of material deprivation at the European Union level (2016, background): “Economic strain (‘great difficulties’ or ‘difficulties’ with making ends meet), which is often used as a measure of financial stress, is closely related to MD (Fahmy and Gordon, 2005; Nolan and Whelan, 2011).”
- Multidimensional poverty measurement in Europe: An application of the adjusted headcount approach (2014, background): “The three dimensions are of varying relevance across the countries of the EU, and the profiles of those it captures as ‘at risk of poverty or social exclusion’ also vary significantly across dimensions (Copeland and Daly, 2012; Nolan and Whelan, 2011; Whelan et al., 2013).”