Measuring uncertainty in fisheries stock assessment: the delta method, bootstrap, and MCMC
By Arni Magnusson, André E. Punt, Ray Hilborn. 2013
79 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Global and Planetary Change, Nature and Landscape Conservation, Statistics and Probability
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/144e9622cb4fed0d36fbc89da7be1cd7ef15360a
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Global and Planetary Change
- Adrian R. Hordyk
- J. Prince
- K. Ono
- Carl J Walters
- Marc H. Taylor
- T. Mildenberger
- R. Schwamborn
- Villy Christensen
In Nature and Landscape Conservation
- Adrian R. Hordyk
- J. Prince
- K. Ono
- Carl J Walters
- R. Schwamborn
- Marc H. Taylor
- T. Mildenberger
- N. Loneragan
In Statistics and Probability
Citations in the corpus
- Assessing sources of uncertainty in length-based estimates of body growth in populations of fishes and macroinvertebrates with bootstrapped ELEFAN (2018, methodology): “…sub-discipline, has been the assessment of the risk of overfishing and stock collapse, usually using Mote Carlo simulations, jackknifing and bootstrapping (Caddy and Defeo, 1996; Hilborn and Peterman, 1996; Francis and Shotton, 1997; Seijo et al., 1998; Seijo et al., 2004; Magnusson et al., 2013).”
- A simple length-structured model based on life history ratios and incorporating size-dependent selectivity: application to spawning potential ratios for data-poor stocks (2016, methodology): “Incorporating the model into a Bayesian framework, using Markov chain 623 Monte-Carlo sampling, would also be an important development for this methodology, and 624 provide Bayesian measures of uncertainty (Punt and Hilborn 1997, Magnusson et al. 2013).”