Preliminary distributional analysis of US endangered bird species

By Mandaline E. Godown, A. Townsend Peterson. Biodiversity and Conservation, 2000

98 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Artificial Intelligence, Ecological Modeling, Environmental Engineering

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/1449aa279379aefd0071f452986a8aa35559e6e4

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Artificial Intelligence

In Ecological Modeling

In Environmental Engineering

Citations in the corpus

Avoiding Pitfalls of Using Species Distribution Models in Conservation Planning (2003, methodology): “…[Nix 1986; Busby 1991] and Simple Overlay), to sophisticated multivariate analyses (e.g., Domain [Carpenter et al. 1993] and logistic regression [Pereira & Itami 1991]), to artificial intelligence techniques using rule-based sets of algorithms (e.g., GARP [Stockwell 1999; Godown & Peterson 2000]).”
Predicting species distributions from herbarium collections: does climate bias in collection sampling influence model outcomes? (2007, unknown): “…models have become a powerful tool to predict the area of occupancy for particular species given the limited information available on occurrence for most taxa (e.g. da Fonseca et al., 2000; Godown & Peterson, 2000; Sánchez-Cordero & Martı́nez-Meyer, 2000; Austin, 2002; Bini et al., 2006).”
Evaluating predictive models of species’ distributions: criteria for selecting optimal models (2003, background): “…predicting species' potential distributions under a wide variety of situations (Peterson and Cohoon, 1999; Peterson et al., 1999, 2001, 2002a,b,c; Godown and Peterson, 2000; Sánchez-Cordero and Martínez-Meyer, 2000; Peterson, 2001; Elith and Burgman, 2002; Feria-A. and Peterson, 2002; Stockwell…”
Predicting species distributions: use of climatic parameters in BIOCLIM and its impact on predictions of species’ current and future distributions (2005, background): “…insights into the biology and biogeography of species (Anderson et al., 2002; Steinbauer et al., 2002), to identify hotspots of endangered species (Godown and Peterson, 2000) or predict biodiversity (Maes et al., 2003), to prioritise areas for conservation (Chen and Peterson, 2002), and to…”
Real vs. artefactual absences in species distributions: tests for Oryzomys albigularis (Rodentia: Muridae) in Venezuela (2003, background): “…characteristics of localities of known occurrence represent a great advance in the production of range maps (e.g. Busby, 1986; Walker & Cocks, 1991; Carpenter et al., 1993; Skov, 2000; 2003 Blackwell Publishing Ltd, Journal of Biogeography, 30, 591–605 Peterson, 2001; Anderson et al.,…”
Predicting the potential invasive distributions of four alien plant species in North America (2003, background): “Beyond invasive applications, GARP’s predictive abilities have been tested and proven under diverse circumstances (Anderson et al. 2002a, 2002b; Godown and Peterson 2000; Peterson 2001; Peterson and Cohoon 1999; Peterson and Vieglais 2001; Peterson et al. 1999, 2000, 2001, 2002; Stockwell and…”
Threshold criteria for conversion of probability of species presence to either–or presence–absence (2007, background): “…on species distribution (Teixeira and Arntzen, 2002; Thuiller et al., 2005; Araújo et al., 2006), and to develop management decisions and conservation strategies (Godown and Peterson, 2000; Schadt et al., 2002; Barbosa et al., 2003; Meggs et al., 2004; Russell et al., 2004; Chefaoui et al., 2005).”
Predicting species distributions across the Amazonian and Andean regions using remote sensing data (2008, unknown): “…2001; Hugall et al., 2002; Graham et al., 2004, 2006), ecological (Anderson et al., 2002), invasive species (Peterson & Robins, 2003), conservation (Godown & Peterson, 2000; Sánchez-Cordero & Martı́nez-Meyer, 2000) and climate change studies (Berry et al., 2002; Peterson et al., 2002; Thomas et…”
Predicting the Distribution of the Amphibian Pathogen Batrachochytrium dendrobatidis in the New World 1 (2005, methodology): “—Niche models were generated with the Genetic Algorithm of Rule-Set Prediction (GARP) (http://biodi.sdsc. edu/bsw_home.html; Stockwell & Noble 1992; examples of GARP uses can be found in Peterson & Cohoon 1999, Godown & Peterson 2000, Anderson et al. 2002a, and Parra-Olea et al. 2005).”
Are niche‐based species distribution models transferable in space? (2006, background): “These models are not only of theoretical interest in biogeography, but are also valuable tools in conservation biology and species management (Miller, 1986; Carey & Brown, 1994; Godown & Peterson, 2000; Engler et al., 2004).”
Uses and requirements of ecological niche models and related distributional models (2006, background): “…in the existing sampling, a modeling step to improve the picture of species' distributional areas is warranted, and several efforts have now taken this step (Araújo et al. 2005b; Godown and Peterson 2000; Loiselle et al. 2003; Peterson et al. 2000; Sánchez-Cordero et al. 2005a; Wilson et al. 2005).”