TRAIT AND STATE CURIOSITY IN THE GENESIS OF INTIMACY: DIFFERENTIATION FROM RELATED CONSTRUCTS

By T. Kashdan, John E. Roberts. 2004

164 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/1412f71f36adf89e0d2268d91ce77e6139374bb9

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Citations in the corpus

Disentangling Curiosity: Dimensionality, Definitions, and Distinctions from Interest in Educational Contexts (2014, background): “While state and trait curiosity have been found to be highly associated (Kashdan and Roberts 2004; Reio et al. 2006), there is evidence that state curiosity positively impacts learning and behavior in ways unique from trait curiosity (Litman et al. 2005).”
Empathy: a motivated account. (2014, background): “Among the litany of well-being’s adaptive consequences (Lyubomirsky, King, & Diener, 2005), observers find happy, as compared to unhappy, targets to be more physically (Diener & Fujita, 1995; Mathes & Kahn, 1975) and socially attractive (Kashdan & Roberts, 2004).”
The benefits of frequent positive affect: does happiness lead to success? (2005, unknown): “…of depression (L. A. Clark, Watson, & Mineka, 1994; Watson & Clark, 1995), individuals high in trait positive affect are, of course, less likely to suffer from this debilitating condition (e.g., Lyubomirsky et al., 2005), as well as from social phobia or anxiety (Kashdan & Roberts, 2004).”
The Curiosity and Exploration Inventory-II: Development, Factor Structure, and Psychometrics (2009, background): “This pool of items contained revised versions of many of the items of the original CEI (Kashdan et al., 2004) and was generated based on the a priori hypothesis that there may be three facets of curiosity: exploring or stretching, absorption, and embracing uncertainty.”
Affective outcomes in superficial and intimate interactions: Roles of social anxiety and curiosity (2006, background): “Our curiosity Wndings converge with our prior work (using the sample from Study 1) showing that trait and state curiosity predict greater interpersonal attraction and closeness as rated by participants and their interaction partners ( Kashdan & Roberts, 2004b ).”
Curiosity and Interest: The Benefits of Thriving on Novelty and Challenge (2009, unknown): “social outcomes ( Kashdan & Roberts, 2004; Peters, 1978).”
The Relationship Between Educational Support and Entrepreneurial Intentions in Malaysian Higher Learning Institution (2012, methodology): “A study conducted by kashdan et al (2004) found that highly curious individual are more motivated to explore new environments to obtain diverse cognitive, perceptual, or sensational information to satisfy their curiosity.”
Appraisal components and emotion traits: Examining the appraisal basis of trait curiosity (2008, background): “The Curiosity and Exploration Inventory is a 7-item scale that emphasises positive emotional experience and feelings of absorption (Kashdan et al., 2004).”
Biased recognition of happy facial expressions in social anxiety. (2006, unknown): “Following past research (e.g., Kashdan, 2002; Kashdan & Roberts, 2004), a single social anxiety score was then computed by standardizing each scale and averaging the values.”
A dimensional analysis of creativity and mental illness: Do anxiety and depression symptoms predict creative cognition, creative accomplishments, and creative self-concepts? (2010, unknown): “…(Heimberg, Mueller, Holt, Hope, & Liebowitz, 1992; Herbert, Rheingold, & Brandsma, 2001; Osman, Gutierrez, Barrios, Kopper, & Chiros, 1998), and it is a standard tool in research on the social anxiety spectrum (e.g., Kashdan & Roberts, 2004; Silvia, Allan, Beauchamp, Maschauer, & Workman, 2006).”
Epistemic curiosity and related constructs: Lacking evidence of discriminant validity (2010, background): “…include the role of curiosity in facilitating cognitive development (Sternberg, 1994; Tamdogon, 2006), school and academic learning (Day, 1982), development of interpersonal closeness (Kashdan & Roberts, 2004), personal growth (Kashdan, Rose, & Fincham, 2004), and job performance (Mussel, 2010).”
Curiosity and pathways to well-being and meaning in life: Traits, states, and everyday behaviors (2007, methodology): “We modified CEI items with the highest factor loadings (Kashdan et al. 2004).”
Interesting things and curious people: Exploration and engagement as transient states and enduring strengths. (2009, background): “In general, curious people report more satisfying social interactions and relationships, and their partners describe them as interested and responsive (Burpee & Langer, 2005; Kashdan & Roberts, 2004, 2006 ).”
Dimensionality of interpersonal curiosity (2007, background): “Given that expressions of interpersonal curiosity are theorized to be highly positive ( Kashdan & Roberts, 2004 ), and peopleinformation is considered interesting across cultures (Brenneis, 1984; Cox, 1970), the wording of”