Chronic Exposure to Fine Particles and Mortality: An Extended Follow-up of the Harvard Six Cities Study from 1974 to 2009

By J. Lepeule, Francine Laden, D. Dockery, Jasmine Schwartz. Environmental Health Perspectives, 2012

982 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Background: Epidemiologic studies have reported associations between fine particles (aerodynamic diameter ≤ 2.5 µm; PM2.5) and mortality. However, concerns have been raised regarding the sensitivity of the results to model specifications, lower exposures, and averaging time. Objective: We addressed these issues using 11 additional years of follow-up of the Harvard Six Cities study, incorporating recent lower exposures. Methods: We replicated the previously applied Cox regression, and examined different time lags, the shape of the concentration–response relationship using penalized splines, and changes in the slope of the relation over time. We then conducted Poisson survival analysis with time-varying effects for smoking, sex, and education. Results: Since 2001, average PM2.5 levels, for all six cities, were < 18 µg/m3. Each increase in PM2.5 (10 µg/m3) was associated with an adjusted increased risk of all-cause mortality (PM2.5 average on previous year) of 14% [95% confidence interval (CI): 7, 22], and with 26% (95% CI: 14, 40) and 37% (95% CI: 7, 75) increases in cardiovascular and lung-cancer mortality (PM2.5 average of three previous years), respectively. The concentration–response relationship was linear down to PM2.5 concentrations of 8 µg/m3. Mortality rate ratios for PM2.5 fluctuated over time, but without clear trends despite a substantial drop in the sulfate fraction. Poisson models produced similar results. Conclusions: These results suggest that further public policy efforts that reduce fine particulate matter air pollution are likely to have continuing public health benefits.

Subfields: Environmental Engineering, Global and Planetary Change, Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/13ce014c2d9f76cba74b8c080403f105bb80b356

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Environmental Engineering

  1. Jordan Macknick
  2. Mark Z. Jacobson
  3. Francine Laden
  4. V. Naik
  5. D. Shindell
  6. R. Wiser
  7. J. Samet
  8. L. Horowitz

In Global and Planetary Change

  1. D. Shindell
  2. D. Millstein
  3. R. Wiser
  4. G. Barbose
  5. M. Bolinger
  6. S. Dalsøren
  7. P. Cameron-smith
  8. Mark Z. Jacobson

In Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis

  1. B. Festy
  2. Francine Laden
  3. G. Heath
  4. V. Naik
  5. D. Shindell
  6. J. Samet
  7. L. Horowitz

Citations in the corpus