Conceptualising environmental collective action: Why gender matters
By B. Agarwal. 2000
421 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Global and Planetary Change, Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law, Sociology and Political Science
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/13b8233d07a519627dc420a26f7a8c7dd3eca212
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Global and Planetary Change
- Ö. Bodin
- H. Ernstson
- A. Quisumbing
- Ruth S. Meinzen-Dick
- T. Elmqvist
- J. Marty Anderies
- Sophia Huyer
- M. Power
In Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law
In Sociology and Political Science
- A. Quisumbing
- N. Kabeer
- M. Power
- Kaman Lee
- Sophia Huyer
- Ruth S. Meinzen-Dick
- C. Kovarik
- Farhana Sultana
Citations in the corpus
- Voice and Agency: Where Are We Now? (2016, background): “In addition, women’s control over assets is often positively associated with women’s autonomy and authority within the home (Bina Agarwal 1994).”
- Factors influencing people's participation in the forest management program in Burkina Faso, West Africa (2011, background): “It has been classified in several ways by, inter alia, Arnstein (1969), Buttoud (1999) and Agarwal (2001).”
- Gender and Sustainability (2014, background): “In much of India, for example, it is women’s duty to provide the fuel to cook the evening meal, and thus they may do something unsustainable in order to guarantee short-term subsistence (40).”
- Closing the Gender Gap in Agriculture (2016, background): “…with small, communitybased and informal groups while men are better connected with groups that operate beyond the locality and are more formalized (Agarwal, 2000; Perez et al., 2015; Westermann et al., 2005). at ASIAN INSTITUTE TECHNOLOGY on September 29, 2016gtd.sagepub.comDownloaded from As a…”
- Does Women's Proportional Strength Affect their Participation? Governing Local Forests in South Asia (2010, background): “These studies, and the insights they provide, as well as my earlier review of these issues in Agarwal (1997, 2000, 2001) lay the ground for taking the analysis further, especially on two counts.”
- How resilient are farming households and communities to a changing climate in Africa? A gender-based perspective (2015, background): “They depend on everyday forms of flexible, reciprocal collaboration in activities such as collecting water, fetching fuel wood, and child rearing, which is consistent with observations from elsewhere (Agarwal, 2000; Cleaver, 1998).”
- Gender differences in Hong Kong adolescent consumers' green purchasing behavior (2009, background): “In fact, Agarwal (2000) contends that females’ social networking should constitute an important basis for environmental collective force.”
- Toward a network perspective of the study of resilience in social-ecological systems (2006, background): “However, it has previously concentrated on networks of human social agents such as individuals or organizations (Agarwal 2000, Tompkins et al. 2002, Schneider et al. 2003) or ecological networks such as food webs (Lassig et al. 2001, Sole and Montoya 2001, Dunne et al. 2002, Garlaschelli et al.…”
- Gender, Class, and Access to Water: Three Cases in a Poor and Crowded Delta (2002, background): “In addition, decision making in state of®ces, mode 4, and in communal institutions (Agarwal 1997a; 2000), mode 3, tends to be dominated by men.”
- Social Provisioning as a Starting Point for Feminist Economics (2004, background): “Agarwal has written numerous articles over more than two decades documenting women’s particular relationships to natural resources in India and the necessity of their active participation in the construction of policy to conserve these resources (see, for example, Bina Agarwal 1994b, 2000, 2001).”