Cross-Listing, Price Discovery and the Informativeness of the Trading Process
By R. Pascual, B. Pascual‐Fuster, Francisco José Climent Diranzo. 2006
128 citations recorded by the source corpus.
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/13b33dc4dbc87c9a9093b963eba2c6bc769ea63f
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
- Gregory C. Arquette
- R. Burdekin
- W. O. Brown
- Tālis J. Putniņš
- Carole Comerton-Forde
Citations in the corpus
- The World of Cross-Listings and Cross-Listings of the World: Challenging Conventional Wisdom (2006, unknown): “One weakness of the Patro (2000) study is that it focuses on portfolios that can mask interesting firm-specific deviations from arbitrage, especially around certain events.”
- US ADR and Hong Kong H-share discounts of Shanghai-listed firms (2008, background): “2 We focus on weekly data rather than daily, or intra-day, data (cf. Grammig et al., 2005; Pascual et al., 2006), as we believe that sentiment effects may otherwise be confounded by exchange rate noise and other very short-term volatility.”
- What Do Price Discovery Metrics Really Measure (2013, background): “For example, the disconnect is likely to be relatively small in studies that compare the contributions to price discovery of different stock exchanges or trading venues that have similar structure using cross-listed stocks (e.g., Hasbrouck, 1995; Huang, 2002; Harris et al., 2002; Eun and Sabherwal, ”