Forced Relocation vs. Voluntary Mobility: The Effects of Dispersal Programmes on Households

By E. Goetz. 2002

133 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Finance, General Health Professions, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/13a6999b859950f5d5e1d695f7e3d6a6567187c3

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Finance

1. J. Friedrichs
2. Jörg Blasius

In General Health Professions

1. J. Friedrichs
2. Jörg Blasius
3. G. Galster

In Sociology and Political Science

1. J. Friedrichs
2. Jörg Blasius

Citations in the corpus

• Out of the Projects, Still in the Hood: The Spatial Constraints on Public-Housing Residents’ Relocation in Chicago (2009, unknown): “…extremely high poverty, it is equally unlikely they will reside in low-poverty neighborhoods (Devine, Gray, Rubin, & Taghavi, 2003; Fischer, 2001; Goetz, 2002; Hartung & Henig, 1997; Kingsley, Johnson, & Pettit, 2003; Newman & Schnare, 1997; Pendall 2000; Wang & Varady, 2005; Wang et al., 2008).”
• Social norms in distressed neighbourhoods: testing the Wilson hypothesis (2003, background): “…City or the French programme Politique de la Ville), and the Gautreaux and the Moving to Opportunity (MTO) programmes in the US (cf. Galster & Zobel, 1998; Goetz, 2002; Johnson et al., 2002; Rosenbaum, 1995), are all spatially targeted, and implicitly take a negative neighbourhood effect as given.”