A Bailey lattice

91 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

RANK AND CONGRUENCES FOR OVERPARTITION PAIRS (2008, unknown): “11) in [22]: 4 (1 + z)(1 + z−1) + ∑”
A Bailey Tree for Integrals (2003, background): “In this case one gets a more complicated structure of the derived set of identities, which is called as the Bailey lattice [16] or tree [1].”
50 Years of Bailey’s Lemma (2009, background): “Moreover, many of the Bailey pairs of Rogers and Slater (as well as later pairs found in [4, 44, 1]) are included as special cases.”
Overpartitions and real quadratic fields (2004, background): “In [9] it is observed that if (αn, βn) is a Bailey with respect to a/q, then (α∗ n, β∗ n) is a Bailey pair with respect to a, where α∗ n = (a/b)n(−b)nqn(n−1)/2(1− aq2n) (bq)n(1− a) n ∑”