On the formation and evolution of black hole binaries

By P. Podsiadlowski, S. Rappaport, Zhanwen Han. 2002

229 citations recorded by the source corpus.

We present the results of a systematic study of the formation and evolution of binaries containing black holes and normal-star companions with a wide range of masses. We first reexamine the standard formation scenario for close black hole binaries, where the progenitor system, a binary with at least one massive component, experienced a common-envelope phase and where the spiral-in of the companion in the envelope of the massive star caused the ejection of the envelope. We estimate the formation rates for different companion masses and different assumptions about the common-envelope structure and other model parameters. We find that black hole binaries with intermediate- and high-mass secondaries can form for a wide range of assumptions, while black hole binaries with low-mass secondaries can only form with apparently unrealistic assumptions (in agreement with previous studies). We then present detailed binary evolution sequences for black hole binaries with secondaries of 2 to 17 M(circle dot) and demonstrate that in these systems the black hole can accrete appreciably even if accretion is Eddington-limited (up to 7 M(circle dot) for an initial black hole mass of 10 M(circle dot) ) and that the black holes can be spun up significantly in the process. We discuss the implications of these calculations for well-studied black hole binaries (in particular GRS 1915+105) and ultraluminous X-ray sources of which GRS 1915+105 appears to represent a typical Galactic counterpart. We also present a detailed evolutionary model for Cygnus X-1, a massive black hole binary, which suggests that at present the system is most likely in a wind mass-transfer phase following an earlier Roche-lobe overflow phase. Finally, we discuss how some of the assumptions in the standard model could be relaxed to allow the formation of low-mass, short-period black hole binaries, which appear to be very abundant in nature.

Subfields: Astronomy and Astrophysics, Computational Mechanics

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/1394bf04bd24225673b51b78d8662dadad4a174f

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Astronomy and Astrophysics

  1. Michela Mapelli
  2. Ilya Mandel
  3. N. Giacobbo
  4. N. Langer
  5. Krzysztof Belczyński
  6. Selma de Mink
  7. F. Rasio
  8. Robert G. Izzard

In Computational Mechanics

  1. N. Langer
  2. J. E. McClintock
  3. Ronald A. Remillard
  4. H. Feng
  5. R. Soria
  6. Michael Kramer
  7. I. Brott
  8. J. Vink

Citations in the corpus