Modeling the choice to switch from fuelwood to electricity: Implications for giant panda habitat conservation

By Li An, Frank Lupi, Jianguo Liu, Marc Linderman, Jinyan Huang. 2002

138 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Wealth, education and cooking-fuel choices among rural households in Pakistan (2019, background): “[50,51,87] The coefficient of the household size is negative and significant for both natural gas and fuelwood and positive and significant for dung cake and crop residue, which shows that households with large families are less likely to use natural gas and fuelwood compared to dung cake and crop r”
Exploring Complexity in a Human–Environment System: An Agent-Based Spatial Model for Multidisciplinary and Multiscale Integration (2005, unknown): “…electricity-demand model suffers from the same limitation in that it links the probability of switching to electricity to a set of socioeconomic, demographic, and geographic factors (An et al. 2002), but cannot identify the impact of this change to specific locations, or to the forests of Wolong.”
Household Fuel Use in Developing Countries: Review of Theory and Evidence (2018, background): “In addition, An et al. (2002), Israel (2002) and Abebaw (2007) claim that age is not affecting fuel use.”
Choice experiment study on the willingness to pay to improve (2009, background): “Some of the CE applied in the energy sector in developed countries include: Alvarez-Farizo and Hanley (2002), An et al. (2002), Aravena et al. (2006), Arkesteijn and Oerelemans (2005), Beenstock et al. (1998), Bergmann et al. (2006), Carlsson and Martinsson (2008), Goett et al. (2000), Han et al.…”