Physically forced, alcohol-induced, and verbally coerced sexual victimization: Assessing risk factors among university women

109 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Sexual Assault on the College Campus (2012, methodology): “Alcohol consumption was measured by summing the responses to three questions that captured the frequency, quantity, and variability of alcohol consumption as identified in prior literature (Felson & Burchfield, 2004; Franklin, 2010a, 2010b, 2011; Leigh, 1990; Ullman et al., 1999).”
Still Second Class (2016, methodology): “The SES-R has been shown to be a valid measure of sexual assault with university samples (Franklin, 2010) with acceptable reliability (Smith & Freyd, 2013).”
Assessing the Effect of Routine Activity Theory and Self-Control on Property, Personal, and Sexual Assault Victimization (2012, methodology): “Gilligan, C. (1982). In a different violence: Psychological theory and women’s development.”
An Investigation of the Relationship between Self-Control and Alcohol-Induced Sexual Assault Victimization (2011, background): “…ride from someone I don’t know well,” “leaving a social event with someone I have just met,” “staying at a party after my friends have left,” “having sex with multiple partners,” and “having sex with someone I have just met or don’t know well” (Franklin, 2010, p. 153; Fromme et al., 1997, p. 430).”