Preserving ON-OFF Privacy for Past and Future Requests
By Fangwei Ye, Carolina Naim, Salim el Rouayheb. 2019
6 citations recorded by the source corpus.
We study the ON-OFF privacy problem. At each time, the user is interested in the latest message of one of N sources. Moreover, the user is assumed to be incentivized to turn privacy ON or OFF whether he/she needs it or not. When privacy is ON, the user wants to keep private which source he/she is interested in. The challenge here is that the user’s behavior is correlated over time. Therefore, the user cannot simply ignore privacy when privacy is OFF, because this may leak information about his/her behavior when privacy was ON due to correlation. We model the user’s requests by a Markov chain. The goal is to design ON-OFF privacy schemes with optimal download rate that ensure privacy for past and future requests. The user is assumed to know future requests within a window of positive size $\omega$ and uses it to construct privacy-preserving queries. In this paper, we construct ON-OFF privacy schemes for $N=2$ sources and prove their optimality.
Subfields: Artificial Intelligence, Sociology and Political Science, Privacy & Security
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Artificial Intelligence
- Martin Jaggi
- Qiang Yang
- Jakub Konecný
- Peter Kairouz
- Peter Richtárik
- Ananda Theertha Suresh
- Jianyu Wang
- Sebastian U. Stich
In Sociology and Political Science
- Aurélien Bellet
- Peter Kairouz
- Rasmus Pagh
- Aleksandra Korolova
- Justin Hsu
- Badih Ghazi
- Salim el Rouayheb
- Rachel Cummings
In Privacy & Security
- Peter Kairouz
- Badih Ghazi
- Rasmus Pagh
- Qiang Yang
- Ziteng Sun
- Adrià Gascón
- H. Brendan McMahan
- Aurélien Bellet
Citations in the corpus
- Advances and Open Problems in Federated Learning (2019, background): “PIR has also been studied in the context of ON-OFF privacy, in which a client is permitted to switch off their privacy guards in exchange for better utility or performance [306, 423].”