Entropy of dialogues creates coherent structures in e-mail traffic.

By Jean-Pierre Eckmann, Elisha Moses, Danilo Sergi. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2004

435 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Computer Networks and Communications, Statistical and Nonlinear Physics

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/135d3d5fb159441f8531e67293198f8fecad0073

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Computer Networks and Communications

In Statistical and Nonlinear Physics

Citations in the corpus

Toward developing a systematic approach to generate benchmark datasets for intrusion detection (2012, background): “General-purpose languages are usually used to detail the steps of an attack; however, special-purpose languages (Arboi, 2005; Cuppens and Ortalo, 2000; Eckmann et al., 2002; Michel and Mé, 2001; Networks, 1999) have also been defined to support the scripting of attacks.”
Universality in network dynamics (2013, background): “A, generating a network of 2 , 688 nodes and 47 , 578 links [7].”
Universal features of correlated bursty behaviour (2011, methodology): “[24] Eckmann JP, Moses E, Sergi D (2004) Entropy of dialogues creates coherent structures in e-mail traffic.”
How Visibility and Divided Attention Constrain Social Contagion (2012, background): “Our study of human response dynamics [23], [24] examines how Twitter users respond to incoming stimuli and shows that retweeting behavior can be properly understood as an interplay between the dynamic visibility of the stimuli and the divided attention of users.”
Statistical physics of social dynamics (2007, background): “…that of sexual contacts (Liljeros et al., 2001) and the ongoing social relationships (Holme, 2003), from email exchanges networks (Ebel et al., 2002; Eckmann et al., 2004; Newman et al., 2002) to the dating community network (Holme et al., 2004) and to mobile communication networks (Onnela et al.,…”
Modern temporal network theory: a colloquium (2015, neutral): “This list of quantities preserved or destroyed could be made longer – triggered event sequences of e.g. person A calling person B calling person C would also be destroyed, unless they concern only two nodes (cf. “ping-pong patterns” [55,66,217]).”
Structure and tie strengths in mobile communication networks (2006, background): “the number of individuals can be very large, but the scope of social interactions to be investigated is more narrow, such as communication via email ( Eckmann et al., 2004; Dodds et al., 2003), instant messaging (Leskovec & Horvitz, 2008), and telephone (Aiello et al., 2000).”
What's in a crowd? Analysis of face-to-face behavioral networks (2010, background): “On-line interactions occurring between individuals can be monitored by logging instant messaging or email exchange(Eckmann et al., 2004; Kossinets and Watts, 2006; Golder et al., 2007; Leskovec and Horvitz, 2008; Rybski et al., 2009; Malmgren et al., 2009).”