The role of genetics in population viability analysis

By F. Allendorf, N. Ryman. 2002

190 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/135b56efb3223427ecad402394fe77649f93ff33

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Citations in the corpus

Methods for Assessing Fish Populations (2010, background): “For example, samples collected from subjectively selected fixed sites, a nonprobability sampling procedure commonly used in fish surveys (King et al. 1981), are applicable only to those individuals or locations actually sampled (Wilde and Fisher 1996)—that is, findings should not be extrapolated to…”
Strategies for conserving native salmonid populations at risk from nonnative fish invasions: tradeoffs in using barriers to upstream movement (2006, background): “In turn, this can lead to a loss of phenotypic variation and evolutionary potential (Allendorf and Ryman 2002), and potentially to reduced effective population size (Waples 2004) and inbreeding depression, both of which could hasten extinction of salmonid populations isolated above barriers (for…”
Genetics in conservation management: Revised recommendations for the 50/500 rules, Red List criteria and population viability analyses (2014, background): “However, ‘‘most published PVAs have not included genetics’’ (Allendorf and Ryman, 2002), and even in the last decade many still have not (Traill et al., 2007; Zeigler et al., 2013).”
Emerging Issues in Population Viability Analysis (2002, background): “But, such purging of deleterious alleles can have demographic costs and may not substantially reduce inbreeding depression (Hedrick 1995; Ballou 1997; Lacy 1997; Allendorf & Ryman 2002; Byers & Waller 1999), suggesting that population history may not reliably predict the relevance of inbreeding…”