Book Review: Language and Woman’s Place: Text and Commentaries
By S. Balder. 2006
321 citations recorded by the source corpus.
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/135881dc64f02711027df3f72286419ba5073111
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
- Yulia Tsvetkov
- Shrimai Prabhumoye
- Alan W. Black
- Percy Liang
- Ruslan Salakhutdinov
- Yoshua Bengio
- Mohit Bansal
- Yoav Goldberg
Citations in the corpus
- Women Are More Likely Than Men to Use Tentative Language, Aren’t They? A Meta-Analysis Testing for Gender Differences and Moderators (2011, background): “Decades later, many researchers credit Lakoff with sparking what has become a widely researched topic (see Lakoff & Bucholtz, 2004).”
- A Corpus-Based Sociolinguistic Study of Amplifiers in British English (2007, background): “First, most of the studies tend to posit static categories (e.g. ‘women’s language’ and ‘powerless language’) and isomorphic relations between linguistic features and putative social classes (e.g., ‘women use amplifiers more frequently than men’), ignoring the dynamic and indexical nature of languag”
- Style Transfer Through Back-Translation (2018, background): “In sociolinguistics, gender is known to be one of the most important social categories driving language choice (Eckert and McConnellGinet, 2003; Lakoff and Bucholtz, 2004; Coates, 2015).”