Modern developments in shear-stress measurement ☆
By J. Naughton, Mark Sheplak. 2002
413 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Mechanics of Materials
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/1337e09852d162970f67cadeb389a49a997dd25a
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition
In Electrical and Electronic Engineering
- Chang-Jin Kim
- Joseph Katz
- Guang-Yi Sun
- Woo-Tae Park
- J. Sheng
- Hyungmin Park
- E. Malkiel
- Frieder Mugele
In Mechanics of Materials
Citations in the corpus
- Superhydrophobic turbulent drag reduction as a function of surface grating parameters (2014, methodology): “Even without the comparative reading adopted here, microelectromechanical system (MEMS)-based sensors (using a floating element) have shown the most promise in obtaining high-resolution, instantaneous and fluctuating shear-stress measurements (Naughton & Sheplak 2002).”
- Using digital holographic microscopy for simultaneous measurements of 3D near wall velocity and wall shear stress in a turbulent boundary layer (2008, methodology): “Various techniques have been developed and implemented for measuring the wall shear stress, using oil film interferometry, chemical probes, or hot-wire MEMS sensors, as summarized in several reviews (Ho and Tai 1998; Lofdahl and Gad-el-Hak 1999; Naughton and Sheplak 2002 ).”
- Review: Semiconductor Piezoresistance for Microsystems (2009, background): “measurement techniques that are broadly classified as MEMS-based sensors, oil-film interferometry, and liquid crystal coatings [282].”