Resource utilization and interspecific relations of sympatric bobcats and coyotes
By Jennifer C. C. Neale, B. Sacks. 2001
113 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Ecology, Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/132a4d873600d5d983dfea2593850e07c80aacc7
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Ecology
- F. Azevedo
- Dennis Murray
- Aaron J. Wirsing
- S. Larivière
- V. Lester
- W. Gorsuch
- A. Merenlender
- J. Hilty
In Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
Citations in the corpus
- Use of Riparian Corridors and Vineyards by Mammalian Predators in Northern California (2004, background): “For example, we know that resident carnivores such as coyotes and bobcats have home ranges of approximately 5 and 10 km2, respectively, in the oak woodlands along the northern California coast (Neale & Sacks 2001), and large natural areas are needed to sustain viable populations of these species.”
- Food habits and space use of gray foxes in relation to sympatric coyotes and bobcats (2001, background): “However, manzanita berries, which were found in 34% of coyote scats (21% of occurrences), were estimated to have contributed <4% of the biomass consumed by this carnivore (Neale and Sacks 2001).”
- Dietary breadth and overlap among five sympatric prairie carnivores (2006, methodology): “To account for instances where multiple items were recovered from a single stomach, we calculated the relative frequency of occurrence of each food item (i.e. Hidalgo-Mihart et al., 2001; Neale & Sacks, 2001a).”
- Food Habits and Livestock Depredation of Sympatric Jaguars and Pumas in the Iguaçu National Park Area, South Brazil (2008, methodology): “…the ability to use human-disturbed areas and diet flexibility through the use of small prey may be more important in promoting coexistence (e.g., Bailey 1993, Ramakrishnan et al. 1999) and increasing dietary breadth of predators (Neale & Sacks 2001), thereby leading to likely increases in overlap.”
- Spatial and Temporal Structure of a Mesocarnivore Guild in Midwestern North America (2015, background): “Bobcats may adjust activity to increase access to prey, but little evidence exists to suggest the species shifts spatial or temporal activity o avoid competitors, particularly coyotes (Witmer and deCalesta 1986, Neale and Sacks 2001b, Wilson et al. 2010).”
- Activity patterns of Asiatic black bears (Ursus thibetanus) in the Central Mountains of Taiwan (2007, background): “Variations in activity patterns and time budgets may also occur in response to competitors, prey, threats or other disturbances (Ayres, Chow & Graber, 1986; Olson, Squibb & Gilbert, 1998; Laundré, Hernández & Altendorf, 2001; Neale & Sacks, 2001).”
- Human activity reduces niche partitioning among three widespread mesocarnivores (2018, background): “3 pensity to eat prey with distinct diel activity patterns (Neale and Sacks 2001), well-documented intraguild hierarchy (Fedriani et al.”