Public Finance and Individual Preferences over Globalization Strategies

By Gordon H. Hanson, Kenneth F. Scheve, Matthew J. Slaughter. 2007

416 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/1307e2767c3f855ca0a0fd1b918e23b7289f2ede

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Economics and Econometrics

In Sociology and Political Science

Citations in the corpus

Do Interest Groups Affect U.S. Immigration Policy? (2008, neutral): “For an overview of the trade literature, see the surveys by Rodrik (1995), Helpman (1997), and Gawande and Krishna (2003).”
Individual Attitudes Towards Immigrants: Welfare-State Determinants Across Countries (2006, neutral): “From a theoretical point of view, Hanson, Scheve, and Slaughter (2005a) differs from our work in that it does not consider the two public-finance scenarios we instead analyze, implicitly assuming that the first one holds.”
Immigration into Europe: Economic Discrimination, Violence, and Public Policy (2014, neutral): “…more emphasis on the economic drivers of hostility and has argued that immigration’s adverse effects on local economies, native wages, jobs, or tax burdens constrain support for immigration (Scheve & Slaughter 2001, Hanson et al. 2007, Dancygier & Donnelly 2013, Malhotra et al. 2013).”
Immigration, public opinion and the recession in Europe (2016, neutral): “Similarly, looking across US States, Hanson et al. (2007) find that higher exposure to fiscal pressures reduces support for freer immigration policies, especially among college graduates.”
Does the Welfare State Affect Individual Attitudes toward Immigrants? Evidence across Countries (2009, positive): “In addition, the main innovation of our empirical analysis relative to Hanson, Scheve, and Slaughter (2007) is to incorporate data on the relative skill mix of natives to immigrants, which varies considerably across countries and affects whether immigrants represent a net burden or benefit for the…”
Do concerns about labor market competition shape attitudes toward immigration? New evidence☆ (2015, neutral): “Another variable through which the welfare channel might operate is the respondent's state of residence, because of the differences in the welfare generosity and income taxes across U.S. states (Hanson et al., 2007).”
Nativism or Economic Threat: Attitudes Toward Immigrants During the Great Recession (2014, neutral): “Other scholars have argued that individual-based economic arguments fail, not because of any materialist concerns, but because individuals vary on the fundamental value of tolerance (see Hainmueller, Hiscox, and Margalit 2011; Harell et al. 2012). For some, immigration increases the threat of change”
Comparing Immigration Policies: An Overview from the IMPALA Database 1 (2016, neutral): “Still others focus on immigrants’ use of public welfare (e.g., unemployment insurance) and taxation, yielding fears from voters bearing fiscal burdens of immigration (Boeri, Hanson, and McCormick 2002; Hanson, Scheve, and Slaughter 2007; Facchini and Mayda 2009).”
International Migration and the Developing World (2010, neutral): “Hanson, Scheve, and Slaughter (2007) find that US natives who are more exposed to immigrant fiscal pressures—are those living in states that have large immigrant populations and that provide immigrants access to generous public benefits—are more in favor of reducing immigration.”
Migration and Foreign Aid (2015, neutral): “Hanson, Scheve, and Slaughter 2007.”