Conservation genetics: where are we now?
By P. Hedrick. 2001
215 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Genetics, Molecular Biology
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/12e67287c04182d6666206b8074803834991b3dd
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Genetics
- Jesús Fernández
- Armando Caballero
- E. Sonderen
- Miguel A. Toro
- B. Pujol
- P. David
- J. Tellería
- Tomás Santos
In Molecular Biology
- E. Sonderen
- Jesús Fernández
- Miguel A. Toro
- Armando Caballero
- B. Pujol
- J. Tellería
- Tomás Santos
- Brian Helmuth
Citations in the corpus
- THE MOLECULAR TOOLBOX: GENETIC TECHNIQUES IN WILDLIFE ECOLOGY AND MANAGEMENT (2005, background): “Therefore, estimates of variation from neutral markers appear to be poor predictors of variation in quantitative traits, provoking some researchers to caution against placing too much emphasis on levels of heterozygosity at neutral markers in the management of threatened species (Hedrick 2001).”
- Pérdida y fragmentación del hábitat: efecto sobre la conservación de las especies (2006, background): “En suma, la reducción, fragmentación y deterioro del hábitat terminan por producir una atomización de las distribuciones originales en subpoblaciones cada vez más pequeñas y aisladas, sometidas a problemas crecientes de viabilidad genética y demográfica (Frankham, 1995; Hedrick, 2001).”
- Introduction Strategies Put to the Test: Local Adaptation versus Heterosis (2004, result): “Similar results Conservation Biology Volume 18, No. 3, June 2004 have been found for both animal species (Hedrick 1995, 2001; Westemeier et al. 1998; Madsen et al. 1999) and other plant species (Fenster 1991; Les et al. 1991; DeMauro 1993; Oostermeijer et al. 1995; Byers 1998; Luijten et al. 2002).”
- Adaptive marine conservation planning in the face of climate change: What can we learn from physiological, ecological and genetic studies? (2019, background): “Accordingly, maintaining large population size to support high genetic diversity is widely acknowledged as a fundamental step in conservation biology (e.g., Hedrick, 2001), but more recent studies have also pointed to the role of environmental heterogeneity (Kelly, 2019).”
- Molecular characterization of breeds and its use in conservation. (2009, background): “Although neutral and nonneutral diversity are expected to be correlated because of the disequilibrium generated by random drift or hitchhiking effects, their comparison could be also misleading because adaptive variants might differ in mutation rates and selective regimes (Hedrick, 2001).”
- Microevolution in agricultural environments: how a traditional Amerindian farming practice favours heterozygosity in cassava (Manihot esculenta Crantz, Euphorbiaceae) (2004, background): “Evaluation of inbreeding and its consequences for conservation genetics is a rapidly developing area ( Hedrick 2001; Hansson & Westerberg 2002; Keller & Waller 2002), but few studies address this issue in the context of in situ management of populations of traditionally managed domesticated plants,”