Shape matching and object recognition using low distortion correspondences
By Alexander C. Berg, Tamara L. Berg, Jitendra Malik. 2005
1,030 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Aerospace Engineering, Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Aerospace Engineering
- Jitendra Malik
- Kristen Grauman
- Silvio Savarese
- Abhinav Kumar Gupta
- Antonio Torralba
- Cordelia Schmid
- Andrew Zisserman
- Marc Pollefeys
In Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition
- Luc Van Gool
- Jitendra Malik
- Andrew Zisserman
- Xiaogang Wang
- Trevor Darrell
- Dacheng Tao
- Ming-Hsuan Yang
- Andrea Vedaldi
Citations in the corpus
- Character Recognition in Natural Images (2009, background): “Geometric Blur (GB) ( Berg et al., 2005 ) is a feature extractor with a sampling method similar to that of SC, but instead of histogramming points, the region around an interest point is blurred according to the distance from this point.”
- SIFT Flow: Dense Correspondence across Scenes and Its Applications (2011, methodology): “Jenny Yuen and Antonio Torralba are with the Computer Science and Artificial Intelligence Laboratory, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA 02139.”
- 3D generic object categorization, localization and pose estimation (2007, background): “A matching scheme such as in [1] is also possible.”
- Groups of Adjacent Contour Segments for Object Detection (2008, background): “of its edgels Ps ∈ [0, 1 ]. We experimentally observed a considerable improvement over treating”
- Scalable Recognition with a Vocabulary Tree (2006, background): “represent an object with descriptors extracted from these local regions [1, 2 , 8, 11, 15, 16, 18].”
- Learning to place new objects in a scene (2012, background): “Early work (e.g., Winn et al., 2005; Leibe et al., 2004; Fergus et al., 2003; Berg et al., 2005) tried to solve shape and orientation variability, limited by a single viewpoint.”
- Feature Correspondence Via Graph Matching: Models and Global Optimization (2008, positive): “Our approach is most closely related to the work of Berg et al. [ 17 ], and Leordeanu and Hebert [18], who formulate visual correspondence as a graph matching problem by defining an objective including t erms based on appearance similarity as well as geometric compatibility between pairs of correspo”
- Image Classification using Random Forests and Ferns (2007, methodology): “This problem has been the subject of many recent papers [14, 15, 16, 26 , 27] using the Pascal Visual Object Classes datasets or the Caltech-101 dataset.”
- Unsupervised Learning of Categories from Sets of Partially Matching Image Features (2006, background): “The authors of [2] introduced a powerful recognition algorithm that uses linear programming to solve for approximate correspondences, and they showed how to use the correspondence-based metric to find regions of common spatial support for objects in labeled training examples, thus avoiding the need ”
- Shape discovery from unlabeled image collections (2009, background): “The success of recently developed shape matching algorithmsandadvancesin shape descriptors[1, 2 , 25, 10, 21, 7] are promising signs for using shape to recognize and detect objects.”
- An Integer Projected Fixed Point Method for Graph Matching and MAP Inference (2009, neutral): “It is a generalization of the classical graph matching problem, formulated as an integer quadratic program [1,3,4,5,7,8,16,17] that takes into consideration both unary and second-order terms reflecting the similarities in local appearance”
- Pedestrian Detection via Classification on Riemannian Manifolds (2008, methodology): “Several object detection algorithms were proposed by assembling the detected parts according to spatial relationships in probabilistic frameworks [12], [52], by discriminative approaches [1], [32], or via matching shapes [ 4 ], [24].”
- Image Based Localization in Urban Environments (2006, background): “Although in object recognition the true correspondences are often not essential they have been shown to improve recognition [1].”