Political Modernisation and Policy Arrangements: A Framework for Understanding Environmental Policy Change

By Bas Arts, P. Leroy, J. Tatenhove. 2006

284 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Global and Planetary Change, Political Science and International Relations, Public Administration

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/12c42ed6cc1972260a47d419aae3e7abaf104d6f

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Global and Planetary Change

1. Karoline S. Rogge
2. F. Kern
3. Michael Howlett
4. G. T. Raadgever
5. Dries. L. T. Hegger
6. H. V. Van Rijswick
7. M. Wiering
8. Carel Dieperink

In Political Science and International Relations

1. Karoline S. Rogge
2. Michael Howlett
3. F. Kern
4. J. Rayner
5. P. D. del Río
6. Ishan Mukherjee
7. J. J. Woo
8. J. Stephens

In Public Administration

1. Karoline S. Rogge
2. F. Kern
3. Michael Howlett
4. J. Rayner
5. M. Scipioni
6. Ishan Mukherjee
7. J. J. Woo
8. G. Capano

Citations in the corpus

• Assessing Stability and Dynamics in Flood Risk Governance (2014, methodology): “The approach has been applied in earlier studies of environmental policies, nature conservation and water management (Van Tatenhove et al. 2000; Arts et al. 2006; Wiering and Arts 2006).”
• Toward more flood resilience: is a diversification of flood risk management strategies the way forward? (2016, unknown): “…management (including water management, spatial planning, and disaster management) as well as their dominant discourses, their formal and informal rules of the game, and the power and resource base of the actors involved (Hegger et al. 2014, see also Van Tatenhove et al. 2000, Arts et al. 2006).”
• Patching vs Packaging in Policy Formulation: Assessing Policy Portfolio Design (2013, background): “Thus, for example, planning and 'steering' involve direct co-ordination of key actors by governments, requiring a high level of government policy capacity to identify and utilize specific policy tools capable of successful moving policy targets in a required direction [80,81].”
• Harnessing theories of the policy process for analysing the politics of sustainability transitions: A critical survey (2017, background): “(2014) combine Hajer’s concept of ‘discursive hegemony’ with discursive institutionalism using the policy arrangement approach (Arts et al., 2006) which highlights four analytical dimensions: discourses, actors, power and rules in a policy field and the broader institutional context of policymaking.”