Resource stoichiometry elucidates the structure and function of arbuscular mycorrhizas across scales.
By Nancy C. Johnson. New Phytologist, 2010
878 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Nature and Landscape Conservation, Plant Science
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/12a2aa23cf4574054efeeea1e9d73e271064c575
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Nature and Landscape Conservation
In Plant Science
- James D. Bever
- Matthias C. Rillig
- J. Jansa
- K. Treseder
- J. Klironomos
- Sally E. Smith
- F. Andrew Smith
- M. Hunter
Citations in the corpus
- Phylogenetic structure of arbuscular mycorrhizal community shifts in response to increasing soil fertility (2015, background): “First, fertilization may enhance competition among coexisting AM fungi because plants generally reduce the amount of carbohydrate supplied to mycorrhiza when they are not limited by soil nutrients (Johnson, 2010; Olsson et al., 2010); and, enhanced competition may result in loss of fungal diversity ”
- Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi as mediators of ecosystem responses to nitrogen deposition: A trait‐based predictive framework (2018, background): “Since our results indicated the opposite trend, we cannot accept the alternate hypothesis derived from Johnson (2010).”
- What is the significance of the arbuscular mycorrhizal colonisation of many economically important crop plants? (2011, background): “There is a good physiological basis for negative MGR (‘parasitism’, as stated by Johnson 2010) if with high soil N there is substantial fungal N uptake and transfer as arginine, with breakdown to NH4 + for transfer across the interface, but release of CO2.”
- Stoichiometric N:P flexibility and mycorrhizal symbiosis favour plant resistance against drought (2017, background): “Moreover, since C:N:P resource stoichiometry is an important influencing factor (Johnson 2010; van der Heijden et al. 2015), the findings of the present study might be restricted to nutrient-limited grassland ecosystems.”
- Efficacy of Biofertilizers: Challenges to Improve Crop Production (2016, methodology): “According to the trade balance model (Johnson 2010 ), parasitic, commensalism or mutualistic outcomes in the AMF symbiosis might be determined according to the E. Malusà et al. 29 relative abundance or availability of N and P and their interaction with carbon supply and demand among plants and…”
- Arbuscular mycorrhizal symbiosis alleviates drought stress imposed on Knautia arvensis plants in serpentine soil (2013, positive): “Based on this cumulative evidence, we assume that N-sink in AMF-tissues is higher compared to plant-tissues, as previously suggested by Johnson (2010).”
- The interactive effects of plant microbial symbionts: a review and meta-analysis (2010, background): “There is a growing appreciation that the environmental context in which such interactions take place determine variation within interspecific interactions (van der Heijden et al. 2003; Thompson and Fernandez 2006; Vogelsang et al. 2006; Johnson 2010).”
- Mycorrhizal effects on nutrient cycling, nutrient leaching and N2O production in experimental grassland (2015, neutral): “It has been proposed that nutrient stoichiometry can determine whether the AMF symbiosis turns out to be mutualistic or antagonistic (Johnson, 2010).”
- Multiple phosphorus acquisition strategies adopted by fine roots in low-fertility soils in Central Amazonia (2019, background): “…plant competition, soil microbial biota, soil depth, seasonality) and fungal hyphae properties (root colonisation rate, growth rate and nutrient-uptake capacity) have all been reported to influence AM colonization (Hoeksema et al. 2010; Johnson 2010; Li et al. 2017; Smith et al. 2011).”
- Mycorrhizal fungi mediation of terrestrial ecosystem responses to global change: mini-review (2014, background): “Plants frequently allocate more resources to mycorrhizal fungi under increased CO2 (Saxe et al., 1998; Rillig et al., 2000; Treseder, 2004; Johnson, 2010), which may lead to greater extraradical hyphal growth (Sanders et al., 1998; Alberton and Kuyper, 2009; Antoninka et al., 2011; Cavagnaro et…”
- Effect of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi on soil enzyme activity is coupled with increased plant biomass (2019, background): “A smaller available P concentration can increase the dependence of the host plant on AMF, which also improves AMF growth as well (Hoeksema et al., 2010; Johnson, 2010).”
- Carbon flow from plant to arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi is reduced under phosphorus fertilization (2017, background): “As a result, the mycorrhizal phenotype may turn to one of parasitism (Johnson 2010) or the C flow from plant to AMF could be reduced (Wyatt et al.”