Sex-specific behavior by a monomorphic seabird represents risk partitioning
By K. Elliott, A. J. Gaston, D. Crump. 2010
125 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Ecology, Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/127e6611285033389f257eb32fb40c5ea568efef
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Ecology
- R. Phillips
- R. McGill
- S. Bearhop
- E. V. van Loon
- J. González‐Solís
- J. Shamoun‐Baranes
- Willem Bouten
- F. Daunt
In Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
- R. Phillips
- J. Shamoun‐Baranes
- J. González‐Solís
- E. V. van Loon
- Willem Bouten
- S. Lewis
- K. Camphuysen
- F. Daunt
Citations in the corpus
- Causes and consequences of individual variability and specialization in foraging and migration strategies of seabirds (2017, background): “…and foraging patterns are also evident in mono - morphic species, including the Brünnich’s guillemot Uria lomvia, which exhibits strong sex-specific diurnal schedules, with one sex foraging mostly at night and the other mostly at midday (Jones et al. 2002, Paredes et al. 2008, Elliott et al. 2010).”
- Sexual segregation in distribution, diet and trophic level of seabirds: insights from stable isotope analysis (2011, background): “The diVerence between sexes in thin-billed prion cannot be explained readily by the mechanisms described above for dimorphic species, but is not unprecedented given evidence in other monomorphic species for sex-speciWc foraging behaviour resulting from diVering reproductive roles, parental investmen”
- Sexually distinct foraging strategies in an omnivorous seabird (2015, background): “These and other findings (examples listed in Elliott et al. 2010) highlight the need to investigate sexual differences in the foraging behaviour of seabirds and other species more closely.”