Differential and total cross sections for top pair and single top production
By N. Kidonakis. 2012
161 citations recorded by the source corpus.
I present theoretical results at approximate NNLO from NNLL resummation for top quark production at the LHC and the Tevatron, including new results at 8 TeV LHC energy. Total cross sections are shown for t tbar production, for single top production in the t and s channels and via associated tW production, and for associated tH- production. Top quark transverse momentum and rapidity distributions in t tbar production are also presented, as well as new results for t-channel single top and single antitop pT distributions.
Subfields: Biomedical Engineering, Nuclear and High Energy Physics
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/127918b9f9a6629122a86795b7608b8262315d9f
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Biomedical Engineering
In Nuclear and High Energy Physics
- Cms Collaboration
- M. Raidal
- Atlas Collaboration
- É. Conte
- S. Visscher
- S. Malvezzi
- Jean-Roch Vlimant
- G. Davies
Citations in the corpus
- Search for gluino mediated bottom- and top-squark production in multijet final states in pp collisions at 8 TeV (2013, methodology): “The top-quark MC distributions are normalized to an approximate next-to-next-to-leading order (NNLO) cross-section calculation [46,47] and the simulated W + jets and Z + jets results to the inclusive NNLO cross sections from the fewz generator [48].”
- Measurement of the t-channel single-top-quarkproduction cross section and of the |Vtb| CKM matrixelement in pp collisions at √s = 8 TeV (2014, methodology): “as obtained in quantum chromodynamics (QCD) at approximate next-to-next-to-leading order (NNLO) including resummation of the soft-gluon emission with the next-to-next-to-leadinglogarithms (NNLL) calculation [7].”
- Inclusive search for a vector-like T quark with charge 2/3 in pp collisions at √s=8 TeV (2014, background): “8 pb [8] with an 8% uncertainty to cover the difference between alternative calculations [43,44].”