Data in New Delhi's predictive policing system
By Vidushi Marda, Shiv Narayan. 2020
53 citations recorded by the source corpus.
In 2015, Delhi Police announced plans for predictive policing. The Crime Mapping, Analytics and Predictive System (CMAPS) would be implemented in India's capital, for live spatial hotspot mapping of crime, criminal behavior patterns and suspect analysis. Four years later, there is little known about the effect of CMAPS due to the lack of public accountability mechanisms and large exceptions for law enforcement under India's Right to Information Act. Through an ethnographic study of Delhi Police's data collection practices, and analysing the institutional and legal reality within which CMAPS will function, this paper presents one of the first accounts of smart policing in India. Through our findings and discussion we show what kinds of biases are present within Delhi Police's data collection practices currently and how they translate and transfer into initiatives like CMAPS. We further discuss what the biases in CMAPS can teach us about future public sector deployment of socio-technical systems in India and other global South geographies. We also offer methodological considerations for studying AI deployments in non-western contexts. We conclude with a set of recommendations for civil society and social justice actors to consider when engaging with opaque systems implemented in the public sector.
Subfields: Information Systems, Safety Research, Sociology and Political Science, AI Ethics, Fairness & Society, Social Sciences & Humanities
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Information Systems
- Vinodkumar Prabhakaran
- Erin Arnesen
- Ben Hutchinson
- Tulsee Doshi
- William S. Isaac
- Divya Ramesh
- Shakir Mohamed
- Marie-Therese Png
In Safety Research
- Vinodkumar Prabhakaran
- William S. Isaac
- Divya Ramesh
- Shakir Mohamed
- Marie-Therese Png
- Ben Hutchinson
- Ding Wang
- Nithya Sambasivan
In Sociology and Political Science
- Vinodkumar Prabhakaran
- Ben Hutchinson
- William S. Isaac
- Divya Ramesh
- Shakir Mohamed
- Marie-Therese Png
- Ding Wang
- Nithya Sambasivan
In AI Ethics, Fairness & Society
- William S. Isaac
- Divya Ramesh
- Shakir Mohamed
- Marie-Therese Png
- Ben Hutchinson
- Ding Wang
- Nithya Sambasivan
- Vinodkumar Prabhakaran
In Social Sciences & Humanities
- William S. Isaac
- Divya Ramesh
- Shakir Mohamed
- Marie-Therese Png
- Erin Arnesen
- Ben Hutchinson
- Ding Wang
- Tulsee Doshi
Citations in the corpus
- Re-imagining Algorithmic Fairness in India and Beyond (2021, background): “, in the premier FAccT conference, of the 138 papers published in 2019 and 2020, only a handful of papers evenmention non-West countries, and only one of them—Marda’s paper on New Delhi’s predictive policing system[127]—substantially engages with a non-Western context.”
- Decolonial AI: Decolonial Theory as Sociotechnical Foresight in Artificial Intelligence (2020, methodology): “…of facial recognition in CCTV through the Lamppost as a Platform initiative (LaaP) (Johnston 2019), New Delhi’s CMAPS predictive policing system (Marda and Narayan 2020), India’s Aadhaar identity system (Siddiqui and Singh 2015), the Kenyan Huduma Namba digital/biometric identity system…”
- How Platform-User Power Relations Shape Algorithmic Accountability: A Case Study of Instant Loan Platforms and Financially Stressed Users in India (2022, methodology): “, documented the amplification of biases when using Western frameworks in the Indian context [71, 86].”