Does Labor's Share Drive Inflation?

By Jeremy B. Rudd, Karl Whelan. 2005

115 citations recorded by the source corpus.

A number of researchers have recently argued that the new-Keynesian Phillips curve matches the empirical behavior of inflation well when the labor income share is used as a driving variable, but fits poorly when deterministically detrended output is used. The theoretical motivation for these results rests on the idea that the output gap—the deviation between actual and potential output—is better captured by the labor income share, in turn implying that central banks should raise interest rates in response to increases in this variable. We show that the empirical evidence generally suggests that the labor share version of the new-Keynesian Phillips curve is a very poor model of price inflation. We conclude that there is little reason to view the labor income share as a good measure of the output gap, or as an appropriate variable for incorporation in a monetary policy rule.

Subfields: Economics and Econometrics

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/126541a0541429584db4c8a1a5f379e91344be97

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Economics and Econometrics

  1. Federico Ravenna
  2. C. Walsh
  3. Michael T. Kiley
  4. Carlos Thomas
  5. Mikkel Plagborg-Møller
  6. James H. Stock
  7. Sophocles Mavroeidis
  8. Hervé le Bihan

Citations in the corpus