Tate’s algorithm and F-theory

By Sheldon Katz, D. Morrison, Sakura Schafer-Nameki, J. Sully. 2011

185 citations recorded by the source corpus.

The “Tate forms” for elliptically fibered Calabi-Yau manifolds are reconsidered in order to determine their general validity. We point out that there were some implicit assumptions made in the original derivation of these “Tate forms” from the Tate algorithm. By a careful analysis of the Tate algorithm itself, we deduce that the “Tateforms” (without any futher divisiblity assumptions) do not hold in some instances and have to be replaced by a new type of ansatz. Furthermore, we give examples in which the existence of a “Tate form” can be globally obstructed, i.e., the change of coordinates does not extend globally to sections of the entire base of the elliptic fibration. These results have implications both for model-building and for the exploration of the landscape of F-theory vacua.

Subfields: Geometry and Topology, Mathematical Physics

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/12317f406e76a8daea3a05d7cb8435049036e380

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Geometry and Topology

  1. Washington Taylor
  2. J. Heckman
  3. Tom Rudelius
  4. Eran Palti
  5. C. Vafa
  6. D. Morrison
  7. Thomas W. Grimm
  8. Denis Klevers

In Mathematical Physics

  1. Washington Taylor
  2. J. Heckman
  3. Tom Rudelius
  4. C. Vafa
  5. D. Morrison
  6. Eran Palti
  7. Thomas W. Grimm
  8. Denis Klevers

Citations in the corpus