Examining the Mediators of Agenda Setting: A New Experimental Paradigm Reveals the Role of Emotions
By Joanne M. Miller. 2007
141 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Communication, Political Science and International Relations
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/121bd37199ef38b75844088440d3c4f009c2772a
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Communication
In Political Science and International Relations
- Teppei Yamamoto
- Sophie Lecheler
- Kosuke Imai
- Linda Bos
- Claes H. de Vreese
- Rens Vliegenthart
- Elizabeth A. Stuart
- Jake Bowers
Citations in the corpus
- The Mediating Role of Emotions (2015, background): “For instance, there is increased interest in the role emotions play in agenda-setting processes and political persuasion (e.g., J. M. Miller, 2007), and findings and research designs based on framing effect theory may be translated into these neighboring theories also.”
- Identification and Sensitivity Analysis for Multiple Causal Mechanisms: Revisiting Evidence from Framing Experiments (2013, background): “Indeed, this is of major concern because, as Miller (2007) points out on the basis of her experimental study, “individuals use information obtained from the media to evaluate how important issues are” (p. 711) and “when media exposure to an issue causes negative emotional reactions about the issue,…”
- News Framing and Public Opinion (2012, background): “”(21) Along these lines, the presumed lack of an accessibility effect of frames is sometimes held to be one of the main distinguishing factors between framing effects and agenda setting and priming.(22) Accessibility, moreover, proves to be difficult to tap by empirical investigation,(23) and studie”