Analysis of cotton yield stability across population densities.

By C. Bednarz, D. C. Bridges, S. M. Brown. 2000

206 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/11d991bbad7962dddf8781990bae4d1aac8aca43

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Plant Science

Citations in the corpus

Yield, quality and leaf senescence of cotton grown at varying planting dates and plant densities in the Yellow River Valley of China (2006, background): “There are a number of factors influencing fiber quality, of which cultivar is of greatest importance while agronomic management is secondary (Bednarz et al., 2005). Previous studies have documented the impacts of planting date and plant density on fiber properties. Bilbro and Ray (1973) found that a”
Comparative Growth and Yield of Cotton Planted at Various Densities and Configurations (2006, background): “( Bednarz et al., 2000 ), and North Carolina (Jones and Wells, 1998) have shown no differences in yield due to plant population (64531–129111 plants ha21, 38623– 276983 plants ha21, and 21518–129111 plants ha21, respectively).”
Yield, Quality, and Profitability of Cotton Produced at Varying Plant Densities (2005, background): “With increasing plant density, a Lint Yield greater percentage of the total lint yield arises from first sympodial position fruit at Main-Stem Nodes 7 throughSeveral studies have shown decreased lint percentage 11 (Bednarz et al., 2000).”
Managing mepiquat chloride and plant density for optimal yield and quality of cotton (2013, background): “Some studies reported no significant relationship between yield and plant density (Hawkins and Peacock, 1973; Baker, 1976; Jones and Wells, 1998; Bednarz et al., 2000), whereas others demonstrated a yield reduction at very high or low density (Bridge et al.”
Nitrogen Fertilization and Yield of Cotton in Ultra‐Narrow and Conventional Row Spacings (2006, background): “This may influence individual boll weight when averaged over the whole plant, since boll weight has been found to vary by fruiting branch position and by main stem node (Jenkins et al., 1990; Bednarz et al., 2000 ).”
Influence of Plant Density on Cotton Response to Mepiquat Chloride Application (2006, background): “... resulting in continuation of bolldevelopment.Acombinationoffactors,suchasamidfullseasonvarietywithincreasedyieldpotential(Legeand Leske, 2003), a greater number of potential fruiting sites because of increased number of main stem nodes (Jones and Wells, 1997), sympodial branch length (Kerby et a”
Effects of plant density and nitrogen and potassium fertilization on cotton yield and uptake of major nutrients in two fields with varying fertility (2010, background): “, 1973; El-Shinnawy and Ghaly, 1985; Halemani and Hallikeri, 2002), but it is usually relatively stable across awide range of population densities (Jones andWells, 1998) through manipulation of boll occurrence and boll weight (Bednarz et al., 2000).”