An evaluation of the Tripartite Influence Model of body dissatisfaction and eating disturbance with adolescent girls.
By H. Keery, Patricia van den Berg, J. Thompson. Body image, 2004
761 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Clinical Psychology, Pharmacy
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/11d7f0f572c329c9a6b7f7c03222156a803fdc28
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Clinical Psychology
- Lenny R. Vartanian
- Rachel Florence Rodgers
- Jasmine Fardouly
- Taryn A. Myers
- Tiffany Melioli
- J. Crowther
- Jessica Miller
- S. Paxton
In Pharmacy
- Lenny R. Vartanian
- Jasmine Fardouly
- Rachel Florence Rodgers
- K. Faure
- Jessica Miller
- Henri Chabrol
- S. Paxton
- Taryn A. Myers
Citations in the corpus
- Social Media and Body Image Concerns: Current Research and Future Directions (2016, background): “Another reason for the lack of overall effect of exposure to one’s own Facebook account may be that, as with traditional media [37–39], social media does not affect all women equally, and that certain individual difference characteristics (e.”
- The Relationship Between Body Image Concerns, Eating Disorders and Internet Use, Part II: An Integrated Theoretical Model (2016, background): “Consistent with this, media-ideal internalization and appearance comparison have emerged as mediators of the relationship between sociocultural influences and body dissatisfaction and eating pathology among adolescent girls (Keery et al. 2004).”
- Does body satisfaction matter? Five-year longitudinal associations between body satisfaction and health behaviors in adolescent females and males. (2006, background): “The high prevalence of body dissatisfaction during adolescence, a critical period of identity formation, is disturbing in that body image, self-image, and self-esteem tend to be closely intertwined [ 3 ].”
- The Relationship Between Body Image Concerns, Eating Disorders and Internet Use, Part I: A Review of Empirical Support (2016, background): “…pursuing the social-promoted thin-and muscular ideal received from these sources of influence are internalized by individuals, and, in conjunction with appearance comparison processes, result in body dissatisfaction and disordered eating (Keery et al. 2004; Rodgers et al. 2014; Sinton et al. 2012).”
- The Role of Friends and Peers in Adolescent Body Dissatisfaction: A Review and Critique of 15 Years of Research (2014, neutral): “…appearance conversations and body dissatisfaction Early - mid adol. girls Social comparison Fully mediated the longitudinal association between appearance conversations and body dissatisfaction Keery et al. (2004) United States Early adol. girls (12.6 years) Social comparison Partially…”
- Body Dissatisfaction Prospectively Predicts Depressive Mood and Low Self-Esteem in Adolescent Girls and Boys (2006, background): “In adolescent girls, a number of structural equation modeling studies that used cross-sectional data have strongly implicated body dissatisfaction as a predictor of low self-esteem and depression (e.g., Keery et al., 2004; van den Berg, Wertheim, Thompson, & Paxton, 2002; Wichstrom, 1999).”
- Facebook Photo Activity Associated with Body Image Disturbance in Adolescent Girls (2014, neutral): “with adolescent samples 8,20 that removing one negatively worded, reverse-coded item (item 4) improves reliability to an acceptable level.”
- The Internet and Adolescent Girls’ Weight Satisfaction and Drive for Thinness (2010, methodology): “The inclusion of both mediators simultaneously in the analyses showed independent mediation effects, a finding consistent with structural equation modelling of the effect of perceived pressure from family, peers, and the media on body dissatisfaction (Keery et al. 2004b; Shroff and Thompson 2006).”
- Social comparison as a predictor of body dissatisfaction: A meta-analytic review. (2009, methodology): “…19.37 Student Correlational Measured Unspecified 0.772 Karazsia & Crowther (2009) 210 Male 19.6 Student Correlational Measured Unspecified 0.847 Keery et al. (2004) 325 Female 12.6 Student Correlational Measured Unspecified 1.124 Kelly (2007) 101 Female 28.65 General Correlational Measured…”