Schrieffer-Wolff transformation for quantum many-body systems

By Sergey Bravyi, David P. DiVincenzo, Daniel Loss. 2011

577 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Abstract The Schrieffer–Wolff (SW) method is a version of degenerate perturbation theory in which the low-energy effective Hamiltonian H eff is obtained from the exact Hamiltonian by a unitary transformation decoupling the low-energy and high-energy subspaces. We give a self-contained summary of the SW method with a focus on rigorous results. We begin with an exact definition of the SW transformation in terms of the so-called direct rotation between linear subspaces. From this we obtain elementary proofs of several important properties of H eff such as the linked cluster theorem. We then study the perturbative version of the SW transformation obtained from a Taylor series representation of the direct rotation. Our perturbative approach provides a systematic diagram technique for computing high-order corrections to H eff . We then specialize the SW method to quantum spin lattices with short-range interactions. We establish unitary equivalence between effective low-energy Hamiltonians obtained using two different versions of the SW method studied in the literature. Finally, we derive an upper bound on the precision up to which the ground state energy of the n th-order effective Hamiltonian approximates the exact ground state energy.

Subfields: Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, Condensed Matter Physics

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/11b3877a67e288ec480f4980e8ed2e432eeb073f

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics

  1. Steven M. Girvin
  2. Alexandre Blais
  3. Andreas Wallraff
  4. William D. Oliver
  5. Maksym Serbyn
  6. D. Abanin
  7. A. Grimsmo
  8. Z. Papi'c

In Condensed Matter Physics

  1. Maksym Serbyn
  2. D. Abanin
  3. Z. Papi'c
  4. Chris N. Self
  5. Marin Bukov
  6. Daniel Loss
  7. Jiannis K. Pachos
  8. Alexandre Blais

Citations in the corpus