How do individual transferable quotas affect marine ecosystems

By Trevor A. Branch. 2009

190 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Ecology, Global and Planetary Change, Nature and Landscape Conservation

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/11763ceb174900f75c13237e2661f43d46f301b3

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Ecology

1. T. McClanahan
2. N. Dulvy
3. J. Rice
4. O. Jensen
5. Nicholas A. J. Graham
6. S. Jennings
7. M. Pratchett
8. J. Cinner

In Global and Planetary Change

1. N. Dulvy
2. T. McClanahan
3. Olivier Thébaud
4. V. Agostini
5. Luc Doyen
6. J. Rice
7. O. Jensen
8. S. Jennings

In Nature and Landscape Conservation

1. N. Dulvy
2. Olivier Thébaud
3. V. Agostini
4. T. McClanahan
5. Luc Doyen
6. J. Rice
7. E. Babcock
8. O. Jensen

Citations in the corpus

• The triple bottom line: Meeting ecological, economic and social goals with individual transferable quotas (2012, background): “Restricting access to fisheries and allocating shares of the TAC as secure harvesting privileges to fishers has been proposed as a way of solving this problem (Grafton et al, 2006; Branch, 2008).”
• Bridging the Divide Between Fisheries and Marine Conservation Science (2011, background): “Finally, the objective of maintaining or restoring marine biodiversity often conflicts with the objective of maintaining or increasing food supplies from the sea, because the level of fishing required to achieve the latter typically compromises the former (Brander 2010).”