Phonation types: a cross-linguistic overview

By M. Gordon, P. Ladefoged. J. Phonetics, 2001

667 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Artificial Intelligence, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Language and Linguistics

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/116f48af0f01c1e4b699ff0bfdb5a483dacd9a28

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Artificial Intelligence

1. Christian T. DiCanio
2. Patricia A. Keating
3. Barry Heselwood

In Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

1. Christian T. DiCanio
2. Patricia A. Keating
3. Barry Heselwood

In Language and Linguistics

1. Christian T. DiCanio
2. Patricia A. Keating
3. Barry Heselwood

Citations in the corpus

• The ‘tight approximant’ variant of the Arabic ‘ayn (2007, background): “Slower adduction is not what is predicted in the presence of an increased Qx value (Gordon & Ladefoged 2001: 399).”
• The phonetics of register in Takhian Thong Chong (2009, background): “Research on phonation type has also found that there is an interaction between the degree of glottal aperture and pitch (Hombert 1979, Ladefoged & Maddieson 1985, Thongkum 1988, Gordon & Ladefoged 2001).”
• Linguistic Voice Quality (2006, background): “Continuum of glottal contrictions (after Ladefoged, 1971), reproduced from Gordon and Ladefoged (2001).”